摘要
《施鲁之争》的作者,重提1933年鲁迅与施蛰存关于《庄子》和《文选》的争论,以为鲁迅对施蛰存进行"人格攻击",致使后者受到"极大的伤害",还说鲁迅有"骂人的习惯","骂,是'鲁粹'之一"等等。论文驳斥了《施鲁之争》作者的种种观点,并回击了其对鲁迅的轻薄、诋毁与辱骂,认为当年"施鲁之争"这一公案,是关乎"五四"开创的中国新文化的建设和发展的原则问题,决不是文人之间的"私怨"和毫无意义的"吵架"。
The author of The Dispute between Lu Xun and Shi Zhe-cun brought up the dispute between Lu Xun and Shi Zhe-cun on Zhuang Zi and Selected Readings in 1933, assuming that Lu Xun had inflicted personal attacks on Shi Zhe-cun so that Shi had been 'much hurt'. Moreover, the author also opined that Lu Xun was in the habit of 'swearing' which is characteristic of Lu Xun, etc. In view of this, this paper aims to refute the various views held by the author of The Dispute between Lu Xun and Shi Zhe-cun and to counterattack the author's despite, slander and abuse of Lu Xun. It is opined in the paper that the then dispute between Lu Xun and Shi Zhe-cun was a legal case involving the matter of principle on the development and construction of new Chinese culture initiated by 'The May 4th Movement' rather than one concerning 'personal resentment' or meaningless 'quarrels'.
关键词
《施鲁之争》作者
“施鲁之争”
公案
私怨
the author of The Dispute between Lu Xun and Shi Zhe-cun
The dispute between Lu Xun and Shi Zhe-cun
a legal case
personal resentment
