摘要
本文是一篇读史札记。１、日本经济史家藤井宏先生认为两浙“商籍”的确立是由于休宁盐商的作用，这是对史料的误解。由此立论推测两淮“商籍”中有山、陕商人而无徽商的原因，显然也就站不住脚。２、笔者从政区沿革的角度着眼，提出：明代两淮“商籍”中无徽商，主要是因为当时安徽与江苏合为南直隶，不符合“商籍”条例。及至清康熙六年（１６６７年）江南省一分为二以后，两淮徽商的“商籍”才提了出来。但由于传统上该二省仍被视作“江南省”，加上徽商以“占籍”形式参加科举考试，故直到两淮“商籍”取消，徽商也始终未能占据一席之地。
AbstractThe Paper is a reading notes on history 1. Hiro Fujii,a Japeness economist thinks that the establishment of 'traders native place'was the function of salt merchants of Xiu Lin,Which is misunderstanding to histerical merchants. So it is tenable that there were only Shanxi and Shaanxi traders but not any Anhui traders in the Liang Huai's'traders,native Place.'2. From the angle of administrative divisions evolution, the writer puts forward that there were no Anhui traders in'traders' native place 'of Liang Huai in the Ming Dynasty and the Main reason is that then Anhui and Jiangsu were merged into one south province directly under the .Royal, which did not tally with the regulation of 'traders'native place' . By the sixth year of Kangxi of the Qing Dynasty(A. D1667),after Jiangnan province was divided into two provinces,'the traders native place'of Lianghui was put forward. But the two privinces were looked as'Jiangnan Province'from the tradition,adding that Anhui traders attended in imperial examination taking the form of 'occupying native place' and so to the canceling of 'traders,native place'of Lianghui,Annhui traders did not occupy any place from beginning to end.
出处
《盐业史研究》
1994年第1期16-19,共4页
Salt Industry History Research
