摘要
古代汉语中很早就存在的偶辞偏指是一种特殊的语用现象 ,并不具有普遍的意义、功能和适应性。用于偏指的双音组合是短语而不是复合词。以前对言语作品中双音组合的“偏义”、“偏举”分析存在着“滥列”和“泛化”之弊 ,教科书和一些文章中经常列举的用例大多经不起推敲。考察言语实际 ,“偏义复词”之说不科学 ,它将短语与复合词相混淆 ,将语言分析与言语分析相混淆 ,将造词法与构词法相混淆。从严格科学的意义说 。
The compound with the meaning inclined to one word, is a particular pragmatic phenomenon, which has existed in ancient Chinese for many years. It hasn’t common meaning, function and adaptability. Disyllabic combination used to express inclined demonstrative meaning is a phrase, not a compound. The analysis on the inclined meaning of disyllabic combination in language works was enumerated and generalized wrongly. Most of the examples in text books and essays can not be deliberated. With regard to language practice, the theory on the compound with the meaning inclined to one word is not scientific, which confuses phrases with compounds, langue analysis with parole analysis, and word creation with word formation. From strict scientific point of view, Chinese grammar system doesn’t include the compound with the meaning inclined to one word in lexical level at all.
出处
《古汉语研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期71-79,共9页
Research in Ancient Chinese Language
关键词
偏义复词
古代汉语
词汇
词义
compound with the meaning inclined to one word
phrase
compound
langue analysis
parole analysis
word creation
word formation
