摘要
为了回答由一则不服中国渔业行政处罚而提起行政诉讼的案例提出的中国领域外形成的证据是否应当经过公证认证的问题,有必要审视在中国法律框架内国际条约优先适用的制度。国际条约优先适用的原则不仅适用于中国实体法领域,而且在民事或行政诉讼法的领域同样适用。作为下位法的行政诉讼证据规则应当让位于国际条约的规定。中美谅解备忘录就是这样的双边国际条约,考量涉案美方案卷能否成为行政诉讼证据,应当根据该备忘录的规定。经过中美执法部门证据交接美方案卷成为中方执法证据之一,符合备忘录的要求,具有证据上的可采性,应当被依法采信为行政诉讼证据。
To reply the question whether the evidence formed abroad shall be notarized and certified in the administrative case due to refusing to accept the administrative decision by our fishery department,it is necessary to resume the principle of applicable priority of international treaties in China's legal system.The principle of applicable priority of international treaties is not only applicable to the substantive law areas in China,but also applicable to the areas of civil or administrative procedures in China.As the subordinate law,the rules of administrative procedures shall follow the provisions of international treaties.Memorandum of Understanding by Sino-American government is such an international treaty.To take the file from American Department into consideration to become the evidence in the administrative procedures,we shall be in accordance with the Memorandum.The file from American Department which became one of the administrative evidence through handing over procedure by Sino-America departments complied with the requirements of Memorandum of Understanding,and with applicability evidence,shall be deemed as the administrative evidence in accordance with law.
出处
《中国海商法研究》
2008年第0期436-444,共9页
Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词
国际条约
优先适用
谅解备忘录
行政诉讼程序
international treaties
applicable priority
memorandum of understanding
administrative procedures
