摘要
关于车位权属及流转规则的争议大致包括:车位是否应定性为业主共有;约定归属制度设计是否有违合同公平;车位是否可以独立出售;车位是否应当闲置等待满足业主的"潜在"需要;车位是否只能租售给业主而不能处分给业主以外的人;开发商与业主以外的人签订的买卖车位的有效契约是否可以随时被宣告无效或被撤销。以上的争议实质上是在一种落后的财富观引导下导致的,它过度地推崇了所有权社会化,试图以所谓"合同公平"取代"合同自由"的核心地位,并通过强化国家管制与干预实现对财富直接的再分配。是当前我国不正规所有权制度运行现状的缩影,实质上造成了车位被固化为静态的财产、被简单当成满足生活需要的普通资产,而无法成为"下金蛋的母鳮"——资本。
Controversy about parking lots ownership and circulation rules broadly include the following: whether the ownership of parking lots must be the objective of the joint ownership;whether it is contrary to the contract fair which the ownership of parking lots should be changed by contract;whether parking lots can be sold independently;whether parking lots should be idle waiting to meet the 'potential' demand of owners;whether parking lots are only permit to sold to the owners and not to the people outside of the owners;whether a valid contract of the sale of parking spaces signed by the developers and owners at any time may be declared invalid or revoked.The above controversy is essentially caused under the guidance of a backward view of wealth,which excessive respected the view of ownership society,trying to confirming the core of so-called 'contract fair' instead of 'freedom of contract',and through strengthening national control and intervention,redistributing wealth directly.It Is the epitome of the present situation of China's formal ownership system.A substantial cause of parking lots is solidified as a static property,simply as ordinary assets to meet the needs of life,not become the capital like the hen which was said to be able to lay gold eggs.
出处
《兰州商学院学报》
2012年第2期106-115,共10页
Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College
关键词
车位
权属及流转规则
制度厘清
观念检讨
parking lots
ownership and circulation rules
system to clarify
concept review
