摘要
羁束行政行为与自由裁量行政行为是学界对行政行为所作的基本分类之一。从逻辑学原理及行政主体实施行政行为的实然状况来审视,学界关于该分类的主流观点存在明显的不当或逻辑错误,这影响了这一分类应有价值和作用的发挥。为使之更为科学合理,更为符合行政行为的实际,并能够在行政法制建设中发挥积极的理论引导与实际应用价值,应以行政主体在决定实施具体行政行为时有无自由或自主选择余地为标准来划分羁束行政行为和裁量行政行为。
Restriction administrative act and discretionary administrative act is one of the basic classifications for the administrative act in academia.However,from the logical principles and the real situation for the implementation of administrative acts,there obviously exist improper and illogical problems from classification perspective which have influenced its the value and the function.For the purpose of making the classification more scientific and reasonable,in accordance with the reality of administrative ...
出处
《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期111-115,共5页
Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
司法部课题"我国西部少数民族地区农村行政执法问题研究"(07SFB2015)
关键词
羁束行政行为
自由裁量行政行为
分类
逻辑思考
Restriction Administrative Act
Discretionary Administrative Act
classification
logical thinking
