摘要
[目的]观察皮牵甩臂疗法治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的疗效。[方法]将66例肱骨外科颈骨折患者随机分为皮牵甩臂治疗组和夹板固定对照组,观察骨折复位情况与肩关节活动情况,并进行比较。[结果]两组间骨折复位疗效评定结果差异无显著性(P>0.05),但肩关节活动疗效评定结果间差异具有显著性(P<0.01)。[结论]皮牵甩臂疗法和夹板固定疗法均具有良好的骨折复位效果,但皮牵甩臂疗法对于肩关节功能的恢复具有更好的疗效。
[ Objective ] To observe the skin traction swing arm curative measures of surgical treatment of humeral neck fractures. [ Methods ] 66 cases of humeral surgical neck fracture were randomly divided into percutaneous treatment group led by the left arm and a fixed splint control group were observed with shoulder fracture reduction activities, and were compared. [ Results ] The efficacy of fracture reduction between the two groups assessed the results of the difference was not significant ( P > 0. 05 ) , but the efficacy of assessment of the results of shoulder joint activities between the difference was significant (P <0. 01 ) . [ Conclusion] skin traction swing arm curative measures and splint therapy were fixed fracture has a good effect, but skin traction swing arm curative measures for the restoration of shoulder function with better results.
出处
《实用中医内科杂志》
2009年第10期83-84,共2页
Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine
关键词
肱骨外科颈骨折
皮牵甩臂疗法
夹板固定
humerus surgical neck fracture
skin traction swing arm curative measures
splint fixed
