摘要
克里普克在《命名与必然性》中提出了历史的因果命名理论 ,并认为存在必然后验真理、偶然先验真理 ,这是为模态逻辑作理论上的辩护。其理论是融贯的 ,奎因对模态逻辑的批评是不成立的。《命名与必然性》为模态逻辑作了成功的辩护。
Kripke advances the historical and casual theory of naming in his Naming and Necessity, which holds that both the necessary posterior truth and the contingent priori truth are in existence, to defend the modal logic in theory. His theory is consistent and Quine’s criticism of modal logic is untenable. Naming and Necessity successfully defends the modal logic.
出处
《玉溪师范学院学报》
2003年第1期37-41,共5页
Journal of Yuxi Normal University
关键词
历史的因果命名理论
必然性
必然后验真理
偶然先验真理
模态逻辑
the historical and casual theory of naming
necessity
the necessary posterior truth
the contingent priori truth
modal logic
