期刊文献+

沉默权的是非之争与正当根据(下) 被引量:13

Right to Silence: Debate in Alternative Jurisdictions and Justifications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英美国家关于沉默权的争论并没有完全否定沉默权的意思 ,而只是对沉默权的具体规则有不同意见。沉默权是一项有充分道德基础的个人权利 ,它既有重要的诉讼价值 ,又可能需要付出一定的代价 ,但一些国家出于保护公共利益的需要对它进行的限制均附带有严格的条件 ,沉默权的基本精神并没有受到损害。坚持和发展沉默权制度 ,仍然是当今世界刑事司法领域的一种基本趋势。 While the right to silence has long been a subject of heated debate in both UK and the USA, nobody has advanced an arbitrary argument as to abolish it completely. Its moral basis, justifications and procedural values have been widely recognized. Strict provisos are attached to limitations of the right out of concern for public interests. The basic international trend lies in not limiting but firmly guaranteeing the fundamental right.
作者 孙长永
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第4期55-63,共9页 Modern Law Science
关键词 沉默权 争论 正当根据 诉讼价值 相对性 right to silence debate justifications procedural values relativity
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1[1]A.Zuckman, THE PRINCIPLE OF EVIDENCE (1989), 转引自Susan Easton, The Case for the Right to Silence[M]. 154 (2nd ed,. 1998). 被引量:1
  • 2[2]A.Zuckman, The Privilege against Self- Incrimination and Procedural Fairness ”, [A]. in THE RIGNT TO SILENCE DEBATE [C]. ( S.Greer and R.Morgan eds., 1990),转引自 Susan Easton, The Case for the Right to Silence[M]. 154 (2nd ed., 1998). 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Barton L. Ingraham, The Right of Silence, The Presumption of Innocence, the Burden of Proof and a Modest Proposal: A Reply to O' Reilly[J]. 86 J.C.L. & Crim 559- 560,565- 566 (1996). 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Susan Easton, The Case for the Right to Silence [M]. 155 (2nd ed., 1998). 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Gregory W. O' Reilly, Comment on Ingraham' s "Moral Duty to Talk” and the Right to Silence [J]. 87 J. C. L. & Crim. 521,527 - 530(1997). 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Alan Donagan, The Right Not to Incriminate Oneself[J]. 1 Soc.Phi. & Pol'y 137,143- 144 (1988). 被引量:1
  • 7[7]转引自 ROBERT S. GERSTEIN, The Self- Incrimination Debate in Great Britain[J].27Am. J.Comp. L.81, 97 (1979). 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Id.at 102 - 103. 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Christie v. Leachingsky, [1947]A.C.593 (H.L.), Lord Du Parcq. 被引量:1
  • 10[10]BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 829 (Abr. 6th ed., 1991). 被引量:1

二级参考文献18

共引文献37

同被引文献45

引证文献13

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部