摘要
[目的]探讨两种不同干预方法对胶囊内镜在小肠运转时间的影响。[方法]因各种原因接受胶囊内镜检查患者共31例,其中时胶囊内镜在胃内停留时间超过60min的12例患者,采用口服促胃肠动力药或胃镜下输送的干预方法,对这两种方法时胶囊内镜在小肠运转时间的影响进行了分析,同时与未干预的19例患者进行比较。[结果]对熙组中15例患者完成全小肠检查,小肠平均运行时间为234.4±70.3min,另4例患者未完成全小肠检查;服药组5例患者均完成全小肠的检查,小肠平均运行时间为121.8±103.7min,胃镜组7例患者均完成全小肠检查,小肠平均运行时间为275.3±81.8mim。[结论]口服促胃肠动力药对胶囊内镜小肠运行时间影响大,不利于对小肠病变的观察;胃镜下输送对胶囊内镜小肠运行时间影响小,但不能发挥胶囊内镜无创,无痛苦的优点。
[Objective]To investigate the influence of the two different methods on the runtime of capsule endoscope in the small bowel.[Method]There were 31 patients who accepted the examination of capsule endoscope.Among these patients,we used pro- kinetic agents or gastroscope for 12 cases with capsule endoscope staying in the stomach for more than 60 minutes.We analyzed the influence on runtime of capsule endoscope in the small bowel with the two methods above and that of the 19 untreated cases. [Result]In the control group,15 cases completed the examination on the whole small bowel,with the average runtime 234.4±70.3min,and 4 of them failed.In medicine group,5 cases completed the examination with the average runtime 121.8±103.7min. 7 cases with the help of gastroscope all completed the examination on small bowel and its average runtime was 275.3±81.8min. [Conclusion]Taking prokinetic agents tends to have more influence on the runtime of capsule endoscope in the small bowel,but it has disadvantages over the observation of small bowel diseases;Help of gastroscope takes less effect on the runtime of capsule en- doscope in the small bowel,while it loses the advantage of no traumas and sufferings.
出处
《浙江中医药大学学报》
CAS
2007年第6期776-777,共2页
Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
关键词
胶囊内镜
运行时间
胃肠动力药
胃镜
capsule endoscope
runtime
prokinetic agents
gastroscope
