摘要
1898-1930年间,美国通过与西班牙签署《巴黎条约》和《华盛顿条约》,与英国签署《美英条约》,明确界定了美治菲律宾的领土界限,我国黄岩岛和南沙群岛部分岛礁并不位于其中.自20世纪70年代起,菲律宾才提出在国际法上根本站不住脚的所谓依据和证据,对南沙群岛部分岛礁提出领土要求并强占部分岛礁,并直到1997年才对黄岩岛提出领土要求.根据国际判例和条约解释的国际法,综观中菲双方主张的法律依据和事实根据,三项条约及其所确立的菲律宾领土界限在判定黄岩岛和南沙群岛主权归属上不具有直接创设条约权源的作用,但它们在证明美国和菲律宾在1898年及嗣后相当长的时期内未对黄岩岛和所谓“卡拉延岛群”提出领土要求、未针对我国明确的主权宣示行为提出对抗性主权主张等关键事实上具有重要的证明价值.
From 1898 to 1930,the United States clearly defined the temitorial limits of the United States colonizing the Philippines by signing the Treaty of Paris,the Treaty of Wash ington with Spain and the Treaty of the United States with UK respectively,excluding China's Huangyan Island and some islands in Nansha Qundao.It was not until the 1970s that the Philippines put forward the alleged grounds and evidence that are untenable in international law,asserting sovereignty over some islands in Nansha Qundao and seizing some of them.It was not until 1997 that it asserted sovereignty over Huangyan Island of China's Zhongsha Qundao.In terms of international jurisprudence and treaty interpretation in international law,weighing China and the Philippines respective legal title and facts,the above three treaties and their establishment of the Philippine teritorial limits do not have the direct legal effect of creating treaty-based title in deciding the sovereignty of Huangyan Island and Nansha Qundao.However,they play a key probative role to establish that the United States and the Philippines in 1898 and quite a long period of time thereafter,didn't claim sover eignty over Huangyan Island and the alleged“the Kalayaan Islands”,and did not put forward conflicting territorial requests against China's explicit territorial claims.
作者
王看
孔令杰
WANG Kan;KONG Lingjie(School of Law,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,China;China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies,Wuhan University,Wuhan,China)
出处
《东南亚研究》
CSSCI
2021年第2期116-134,共20页
Southeast Asian Studies
基金
中国博士后科学基金第66批面上资助项目“菲律宾在南海的领土主权和海洋权利主张演变”(2019M663335)。
关键词
菲律宾
条约界限
黄岩岛
南沙群岛
领土争端
The Philippines
the Treaty Limit
Huangyan Island
Nansha Qundao
Terri torial Dispute
