摘要
毒品犯罪的固有属性,使得行为人供述在司法认定中占据了极其重要的地位。在物理现场存续脆弱、缺乏证据来源的毒品犯罪中,供述既可以起到还原案件事实并证明行为人人身危险性降低的常态化作用,还可以作为侦破案件的重要线索和认定具体犯罪是否成立的关键证据。司法机关在办理毒品犯罪案件的过程中,对于追索供述具有强烈的动力。然而与这一境况相对应的,是毒品犯罪繁复的法益类型、实体法上的严厉化立场以及证据法上过高的证据规格,这都导致了毒品犯罪供述呈现出极度短缺的现象。司法过程中供述的必要性与获取供述的法律障碍形成了难以调和的矛盾,从而对司法认定与刑罚裁量产生消极影响。强调改善讯问措施和方法的传统思路已然无法应对这一问题,化解毒品犯罪的供述障碍,应当从反思立法适当性的角度出发,通过优化实体法与证据法规则,建构有利于获取供述的规范体系。
With the inherent attributes of drug crimes,a perpetrator’s confessions play an extremely important role in judicial determination.In drug crimes,the crime scenes are difficult to maintain and the sources of evidence are insufficient.In this case,a perpetrator’s confessions can not only help restore the facts of the case and prove lower dangers he may cause,but also serve as an important clue to criminal investigation and key evidence in conviction for specific crimes.However,drug crime confessions are insufficient due to the complicated types of legal interests in drug crimes,the severe-penalty doctrine in substantial law and the exceedingly high standard of evidence in evidence law.The irreconcilable contradiction between the necessity of confession and the legal impediments to obtaining confessions exerts a negative impact on judicial determination and penalty discretion.For this reason,it is proposed to construct a normative system conducive to obtaining confessions by optimizing the rules in substantive law and evidence law from the perspective of reflection on the appropriateness of legislation.
出处
《公安学研究》
2022年第4期50-65,123-124,共18页
Journal of Public Security Science
基金
中国人民公安大学2021年度研究生课程建设项目“预审学”(2021yjskcjs010)
