摘要
关于我国司法实务中过失致人死亡的案例,存在争议的关键点主要在于对过失的认定,即被告人对于结果的发生是否的确存在预见可能性,从而基于疏忽大意或者不当的过分自信导致了危害结果的发生。此外,从预见可能性本身出发,其预见程度也是一个值得探讨的问题,但目前,由于我国司法实务中对于预见可能性的判断没有一个较为清晰的标准,所以常常出现对此方面过于笼统的论述,对预见可能性的判断也存在流于形式的情况。
In the judicial practice of our country,the main dispute over a case of negligently causing death to another person lies in the determination on negligence.That is,whether the defendant has possibility to foresee the occurrence of the result or not,and whether the harmful results are caused by the defendant’s negligence or improper overconfidence.In addition,the degree of the possibility to foresee is also a problem worthy of discussion.Currently,there is no clear judgment standards for the possibility to foresee in China’s judicial practice,so the discussions on this issue are not specific enough and the judgment on the possibility to foresee is merely formalistic.
作者
马圣昆
徐久生
Ma Shengkun;Xu Jiusheng(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100089,China)
出处
《贵州警察学院学报》
2020年第5期60-67,共8页
Journal of Guizhou Police College
关键词
过失致人死亡罪
预见可能性
预见标准
客观归责理论
crime of negligently causing death to another person
possibility to foresee
standard for foreseeing
objective imputation theory
