摘要
高质量审稿意见不仅言之有据,对稿件全面客观评价,而且提出富有建设性的修改建议,具有很高的学术价值。从目前已刊发的情况看,高质量审稿意见按内容可分为珍贵史料型、学术争鸣型和学习借鉴型3种类型,按刊登载体模式可分为纸质刊物刊登型、纯网络版刊发型、审稿专家个人微信公众号推送型3种主要形式。选登高质量的审稿意见有利于培养稳定优秀审稿人队伍,有利于优质学术资源的共享与示范,有利于学术期刊的科研诚信建设。学术期刊可普及和推广高质量审稿意见选登,科研单位可将选登的高质量审稿意见纳入审稿人的工作业绩,全面推动学术期刊和科研工作的繁荣发展。
High-quality review opinions not only provide well-founded and comprehensive objective evaluations of the manuscript,but also offer constructive suggestions for modification,which has high academic value.The classification of high-quality review comments can be divided into three types based on the content:precious historical data type,academic contention type,and learning reference type.Based on the publication carrier mode,it can be divided into three main forms:paper publication type,pure online publication type,and review expert personal WeChat official account push type.Selecting high-quality review opinions is beneficial for building and training an excellent team of reviewers,promoting the sharing and demonstration of high-quality academic resources,and promoting the integrity construction of academic journals.Academic journals can popularize and promote the selection of high-quality review opinions,while scientific research institutions can incorporate selected high-quality review comments into the work performance of reviewers,comprehensively promoting the prosperity and development of academic journals and scientific research.
作者
肖湘
贺嫁姿
XIAO Xiang;HE Jiazi(Journal Center of Guangzhou University,510006,Guangzhou,Guangdong;不详)
出处
《编辑学报》
北大核心
2023年第3期347-351,共5页
Acta Editologica
基金
广东省高校学报研究会编辑学项目(20180305)
国家社科基金2021年度一般项目(21BXW085)
