摘要
我国尚未就体育赛事视听信息的民事权利保护模式达成共识。目前,各国关于体育赛事视听信息的保护有两种模式:体育赛事视听信息著作权保护模式,即将体育赛事摄制成果作为视听作品保护的模式;体育赛事视听信息权保护模式,即对体育赛事活动组织者采集体育赛事视听信息并向公众传播和进行商业利用的权利进行保护的模式。从规范科学性、权利正当性、经济合理性和体系自洽性的维度考察,相较于视听作品著作权保护模式,体育赛事视听信息权保护模式不仅能够维持体育赛事视听信息传播关系中的利益均衡、稳固《中华人民共和国著作权法》概念体系的柱石,而且在司法实践中更有利于妥当解决因采集、传播体育赛事视听信息行为引发的纠纷,也更符合法律方法论的要求。我国体育赛事视听信息权的构建需要在权利限制、禁令救济、请求权竞合等方面加以完善。
The consensus has not been reached on the civil rights foundation for protecting audiovisual information of sports events in China.There are two modes about the protection of audiovisual information of sports events:The copyright protection mode for audiovisual information of sports events,that is,the productions of recording sports events are regarded as the audiovisual works under the copyright law;The mode of sports events audiovisual information right is to protect the rights that sports events organizers to collect audiovisual information,broadcast and commercially exploit sports events.Considering soundness of rules,legitimacy of rights,economic rationality,and systematic consistency,applying sports events audiovisual information right mode not only can balance the profits of different stakeholders in broadcasting sports events,stabilize the conceptual system and the theoretical framework of The Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China,but also resolve disputes in collecting and broadcasting sports events audiovisual information more appropriately in judicial practice,rather than copyright protection mode.And the former is more in line with the spirit of law in judicial practice.Nevertheless,there is room for improvement in mode of sports events audiovisual information right,such as its restraints to the right,injunctive relief,and the concurrence of claims.
出处
《法商研究》
北大核心
2023年第2期187-200,共14页
Studies in Law and Business
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究资助项目(2022JZDZ002)
关键词
体育赛事视听信息权
体育赛事活动组织者
广播组织权
视听作品
sports events audiovisual information right
sports events organizers
rights of broadcasting organizations
audiovisual works
