摘要
因未完全贯彻信赖理论,《担保制度司法解释》中公司担保相对人善意判断之规定存在定义狭隘、情形类型化不足、善意判断依据单一等不足。基于信赖理论的展开,代表人权限应源自决议授权,而非身份附带,法定代表人外的其他主体亦可为代表人,但不同身份所负载的可信赖程度不同,可以影响审查义务的强弱程度。相对人形式审查公司决议并无实益,其需对印章、代表人身份、管理性强制规范等进行相应核查,但核查范围应满足易获取性、明显外观瑕疵、信息归纳简易性等要求。此外,被披露的信息、交易习惯等事实单一或相互结合,能够达到推定代表人有代表权的程度,相对人基于此产生的信赖,仍为善意,但明知无公司决议的情形除外。
Due to the failure to fully implement the theory of trust,the"Judicial Interpretation of the Guarantee System"and other norms have deficiencies such as narrow definitions,insufficient typology of situations,single basis for good faith judgment,and loopholes in the distinction between subjective and objective in corporate guarantees.Because the company guarantees have the characteristics of non-profit and contingency,the reliability of the appearance should be weakened,and in order to achieve the balance of interests among various subjects and manage and control risks,the creditor can only constitute goodwill by fulfilling the corresponding review obligations.The authority of the representative comes from the authorization of the resolution,not the identity.Other subjects other than the legal representative can also be the representative,but the degree of trustworthiness carried by different identities is different,which will have a substantial impact on the strength of the review obligation.It is not beneficial to review the company’s resolution by the form of the creditor,and it needs to conduct corresponding verification of the seal,the identity of the representative,and the mandatory management specifications.In addition,the disclosed information,trading habits and other facts are single or combined,and can reach the level of presumption that the representative has the right to represent,and the trust generated by the creditor based on this is still in good faith,except when knowing that there is no company resolution.
出处
《荆楚法学》
2022年第6期45-56,共12页
Jingchu Law Review
关键词
越权担保
信赖原则
善意判定
审查义务
Ultra Vires Guarantee
Reliance Principle
Good Faith Judgment
Review Obligation
