摘要
信息网络犯罪的帮助行为在犯罪进程中可以发挥主要作用,这对将帮助犯一概认定为从犯处罚的传统评价模式形成挑战。对此问题,"帮助犯主犯化"的归责路径具有理论依据与现实必要性。在我国双层区分制的犯罪参与体系下,应确立形式的正犯概念,正犯等同于实行犯但不等同于主犯。而且在双层区分制中,不同层次下的分类功能与评价标准不同,使正犯与主犯、帮助犯与从犯之间不成立一一对应关系,对于共同犯罪中起主要作用的行为人,应认定为作用分类中的主犯。此外,从解释论的角度也不应将我国《刑法》第27条规定的"辅助作用"解释为"帮助作用"。贯通帮助犯通往主犯之路,对刑法理论和司法实践均大有裨益。
The traditional view thinks that all of aider is accessorial offender so that the sentencing of aider must be lighter than the principal offender.Helping behavior in cybercrime can play a major role in the criminal process.In order to solve this problem,the legislative mode that taking the aider as perpetrator is not compatible with traditional theories,but the legislative mode is feasibility and necessity.In the accomplice system of two-layer differentiation of China,formal principal offender concept should be used.The perpetrator is equivalent to perpetrator but not equal to the principal.In the two-layer differentiation,the different of classification functions and evaluation criteria at different layer makes that the relationships is not one-to-one correspondence between perpetrator and principal offender,aider and accessorial offender.As long as the perpetrator plays a major role in the joint crime,it should be identified as the principal offender in the function classification.In the perspective of interpretation,the“auxiliary function”of Article 27 of the Criminal Law cannot be interpreted as“help function”.The aider can be identified as the principal offender can bring benefits to Criminal law theory and judicial practice.
作者
郑洋
Zheng Yang(Law School of Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China)
出处
《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期53-58,共6页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“现代信息科技的运用给刑法带来的挑战及其应对”(19SFB2018)阶段性成果
关键词
双层区分制
帮助犯
主犯
正犯
帮助行为正犯化
two-layer differentiation
aider
principal offender
perpetrator
taking the aider as perpetrator
