期刊文献+

基于“SEC”模式新旧版高中物理必修二课后习题的分析比较 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 利用"SEC"模式作为分析工具,对2019版和2004版的人教版高中物理必修二教材的课后习题与课程标准一致性程度进行分析比较,通过绘制柱状图、雷达图进行直观比较,发现新版本教材一致性程度有所提高,但各认知水平不平衡。
出处 《湖南中学物理》 2021年第5期31-35,共5页 Hunan Middle School Physics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1盛群力,褚献华.布卢姆认知目标分类修订的二维框架[J].课程.教材.教法,2004,24(9):90-96. 被引量:160
  • 2Anderson L. W, Krathwohl D. R. et. al. Taxonomy for Leafing, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom ' s ,Taxonomy of Educational Objectives ( Abridged Edition.) [M]. New York: Longman. 2001.38-62, 63-92. 被引量:1
  • 3Krathwohl, D. R. A Revision of Bloom's Taxconomy: An Overview [J]. Theory into Practice, 2002,(4): 212-218. 被引量:1
  • 4L.W.安德林 L.A.索斯尼克 谭晓玉 袁文辉 译.布卢姆教育目标分类——40年的回顾[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1998,8.. 被引量:1
  • 5Norman,L.Webb. Aligument of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States. Council of Chief State School Officers. Washington,DC August, 1999.23. 被引量:1
  • 6U.S.Congress.House of Representatives. Improving Americans Schools.Act.Washington. DC:U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. 8. 被引量:1
  • 7Porter.How SEC.Measures Alignment.Educational Researcher, 1997(5):2,12,9,5,8. 被引量:1
  • 8Norman L.Webb. Criteria for Ahgnment of Expectation and Asses Sment in Maths and Science Education. Washington. DC :National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin- Madison and Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.14-22. 被引量:1
  • 9Porter, A. C. Creating a System of School Process Indicators.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1991, (1): 29. 被引量:1
  • 10Xiufeng Liu,Baohui Zhang,Ling L Liang,Gavin Fulmer,Beaumie Kim,Haiquan Yuan.Alignment Between the Physics Content Standard and the Standardized Test.A Comparison Among the United States-New York State,Singapore,and China-Jiangsu[].Science Education.2008 被引量:1

共引文献253

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部