摘要
“双减”政策自实施以来已取得显著成效,然而政策实际执行效果与预期存在一定的偏差。本研究使用CiteSpace对“双减”政策相关文献进行分析后发现,当前“双减”政策的执行偏差可分为选择性执行、替换性执行、机械性执行和象征性执行四种类型,其背后的动因包括政策整体设计的缺憾、政策执行机构的放任、政策受众的冲突、政策执行环境的制约。因此,需从政策本身、执行机构、政策受众和政策环境四个方面着手推进“双减”政策的有效执行。
Since the implementation of the“double reduction”policy,the actual effect has deviated from the expectation of the policy.This study uses CiteSpace to analyze the relevant literature of the“double reduction”policy.It is found that the implementation deviation of the current“double reduction”policy can be divided into four types:selective implementation,alternative implementation,mechanical implementation and symbolic implementation.The motivations behind the deviation include the inadequacy of the overall policy design,the indulgence of the policy implementation agencies,the conflict among the policy audience,and the constraints of the policy implementation environment.Therefore,it is necessary to promote the effective implementation of the“double reduction”policy from the policy itself,the implementing agencies,the policy audience and the policy environment.
作者
余晖
陈心彧
Yu Hui;Chen Xinyu
出处
《中国教育法制评论》
2023年第2期223-233,共11页
Chinese Educational Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金2022年度教育学青年项目“‘双减’背景下学科类家教的治理路径研究”(CFA220312)的阶段性结果
