摘要
作为认罪认罚从宽制度适用于监察程序的法律依据,《监察法》第31条意义重大,并且在立法表述上具有显著特征。在理念指引层面,强调"主动性"是其主要基调;在制度设计层面,呈现出权力扩张和权利克减的双向趋势;在适用条件层面,体现为从宽实体条件设置严苛,从宽处罚建议批准程序行政色彩浓厚。以上立法特征虽然源于《监察法》"惩前毖后,治病救人"的价值追求,但在实践中却容易衍生出制度认识错位、适用范围受限、对于后续程序产生不当约束、"法法衔接"中矛盾加剧等新问题。这些问题不仅影响认罪认罚从宽在监察程序中的作用发挥,其不利后果还可能延伸至刑事诉讼程序,难以契合司法改革的期待和要求。因此,有必要从宏观理念、中观制度、微观条件三个层面分别对当前立法予以校正,以此实现认罪认罚从宽在监察程序中的精准适用。
The legal provisions concerning the leniency system of pleading guilty and accepting punishments in the supervision procedure are of great significance with distinctive features in the legislative expression,not only affecting the crime cases,but also mattering whether the procedures are smoothly connected.Article 31 of The Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China,with distinctive features,is the legal basis of leniency system of pleading guilty and accepting punishments in the supervision system.Article 31,with emphasis initiative at the level of conceptual guidance,shows a two-way trend of power expansion and power derogation at the level of system design,reflecting the strict conditions and the"leniency proposal"at the level of proposes operation.Although a unique value pursuit is displayed,it is likely to lead to new problems,such as misunderstanding of the system,depriving criminal suspects of relevant rights,and improperly restriction of subsequent procedures.These problems impose a negative effect on the enforcement in practice and criminal procedures,which fails to meet the expectations and requirements of judicial reform.Therefore,it is necessary to reform the current legislation in order to reach the legislative goal in a right way.
作者
周慧琳
ZHOU Huilin(Law School,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430000,Hubei,China)
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第5期21-28,共8页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“律师参与认罪认罚程序的相关问题研究”(17BFX058)
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
监察程序
职务犯罪
主动认罪
leniency on guilty pleading and punishment acceptance
supervision process
duty-related violations and crimes
proactive confession
