摘要
社会权的主要作用是通过国家积极介入去调节个人难以改变的既存差异,保障机会平等,进而促进社会公正。宪法社会权的“权”应理解为密切的权利关联性,但并非实质上的基本权利。宪法社会权条款仅具有客观法性质,课以国家积极作为的义务,但并不对应个人的主观请求权,应被理解为国家任务。虽然社会权与给付义务功能都强调社会法治国理念下的国家积极作为义务,但二者在再主观化的条件、适用对象、实现程度等方面均存在显著差异,本质作用并不相同,社会权无法取代给付义务成为基本权利功能。
The main role of social rights is to adjust the existing differences that are difficult to change among individuals through the active intervention of the state,to ensure equal opportunities,and to promote social justice.The“right”of constitutional social rights should be understood through its close relationship to rights,but not as an actual fundamental right.The social rights clause of the constitution only has the nature of objective law and imposes the obligation of the state to act positively,but it does not correspond to the subjective right of the individual,and should be understood as a state task.Although the functions of social rights and payment obligations both emphasize that the state actively acts as an obligation under the concept of social rule of law,there are significant differences between the two in terms of re-subjectivization conditions,applicable objects and degree of realization,and their essential functions are not the same.Constitutional social rights cannot replace the payment obligation as a function of fundamental rights.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期785-802,共18页
Peking University Law Journal
关键词
社会权
基本权利
给付义务
机会平等
国家任务
Social Rights
Fundamental Rights
Payment Obligations
Equal Opportunities
State Tasks
