摘要
在哈罗德·布鲁姆眼中,西尔维娅·普拉斯是"靠英年早逝而获得一时声名"的拙劣诗人,肤浅、负面、不具备真正审美价值,其诗歌只有新创一种"怨恨美学"才能加以阐释。布鲁姆的质疑和嘲讽基于他对美学传统的坚持,然而背离传统的普拉斯却独具特质:自白化表达方式的简单只是欺骗性的假象,其实在审美选择、审美距离和审美自律的问题上,普拉斯的别样创新实践在那个时代具有开创性的意义。
In the view of Harold Bloom,Sylvia Plath is no more than"a versifier whose tragic early death gave her a certain glamour for a time",superficial,negative,and lack of authentic aesthetic value;her poetry can be interpreted only by a newly fabricated"aesthetic of Resentment".Bloom’s jeering criticism is justified in light of his insistence on aesthetic tradition,but Plath’s deviation from tradition has pioneering significance for the age:below the deceptive simplicity of the confessional style,unique originality exists in Plath’s poetic practice on aesthetic choice,aesthetic distance and aesthetic autonomy.
作者
叶金梅
Ye Jinmei(Nanjing Institute of Visual Arts)
出处
《世界文学评论（高教版）》
2019年第2期94-100,共7页
The World Literature Criticism
基金
江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目“诗歌疗法理论与应用研究”(项目编号:2017SJB0717)的阶段性研究成果.
关键词
“怨恨美学”
审美选择
审美距离
审美自律
"aesthetic of Resentment"
aesthetic choice
aesthetic distance
aesthetic autonomy
