期刊文献+

中国哲学“新开展”的多重路径——2019—2021沪上中国哲学学科发展评议

The Crisis of“Legitimacy”of Chinese Philosophy and its“New Development”Path:A Review of the Development of Shanghai Chinese Philosophy from 2019to 2021
原文传递
导出
摘要 上海中国哲学学界近三年来(2019—2021)对于中国哲学的研究主要集中在三个方面:其一为对“智慧说”、经学、礼学等以及中国哲学的跨文本研究;其二为重论中国哲学的“合法性”问题;其三为对中国哲学未来路径的探索。沪上学界对“智慧说”等研究将步入更广阔的“世界性百家争鸣”视域,对中国哲学的未来出路探寻亦将侧重“普遍性”、“超越性”重建以及对时代问题的预警、批判、回应与引领。 The research on Chinese philosophy in Shanghai in the past three years has focused on three aspects,one of which is the cross-textual study of the“theory of wisdom”,Confucian classics,ritual study,and Chinese philosophy;the other is to revisit the“legitimacy”of Chinese philosophy;and the third is to explore the future path of Chinese philosophy.The“legitimacy”of Chinese philosophy has three dimensions:first,the absence of historical discourse of modernity and the apprenticeship,which leads to a weak response to the crisis of Chinese society;second,the dilution and forgetfulness of transcendence and universality at the level of philosophical existentialism,which leads to the study of Chinese philosophy based more on a historical documentation of“local knowledge”;third,the localized and narrow understanding at the level of Chinese philosophical disciplines,which leads to the obscuring of the cross-textual richness of the identity stream of Chinese philosophy history.The study of the“theory of wisdom”and other studies in Shanghai will enter a broader view of the“world contention”,and the search for the future of Chinese philosophy will focus on the reconstruction of“universality”and“transcendence”as well as the early warning,criticism,response and leadership to the problems of the times.
作者 刘君莉 张永超 Liu Junli;Zhang Yongchao
出处 《思想与文化》 2022年第2期379-397,共19页 Thought & Culture
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“儒家伦理的现代困境及其转型路径研究”(20BZX074)
关键词 合法性 超越性 汉语哲学 legitimacy transcendence Chinese-language Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献60

二级参考文献276

共引文献407

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部