摘要
国际投资争端解决是近年来国际投资法研究的重点,而投资者与东道国政府之间的争端解决,历来是国际投资争端解决中最为复杂的问题。在国际投资条约仲裁程序中,由于不存在至高无上的司法权威,因此,任何投资仲裁庭的仲裁权均来自争端当事方的合意授予。但除了具备争端当事方的仲裁合意外,仲裁庭管辖权的取得还须充分满足其他相关的法定要件。第一部分对恩卡纳公司诉厄瓜多尔共和国仲裁案这一经典案例的投资事实、主要法律争议进行了梳理和分析,对国际投资中的间接征收的认定问题和管辖权争议进行研究。第二部分结合当前国际投资形势,首先对本案涉及的管辖权争议进行研究,突出属物管辖权、属人管辖权等管辖权在本案中对案件实体纠纷有效裁决的作用。其次以间接征收认定的本质为逻辑起点,厘清其与无需补偿的政府管制措施之界限,并由此提出间接征收认定的三种方式:具体问题具体分析、丰富认定要素以及应用比例原则。
International investment dispute settlement is the focus of international investment law in recent years,and the dispute settlement between investors and host governments is always the most complicated problem.In international investment treaty arbitration proceedings,since there is no supremacy of judicial authority,the arbitration power of any investment tribunal comes from the consent of the parties to the dispute.However,in addition to the arbitration agreement of the parties to the dispute,the acquisition of the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal must fully meet other relevant statutory requirements.In the first part of this paper,the author combs and analyzes the investment facts and the main legal disputes in the classic case of EnCana v.Republic of Ecuador,and studies the determination of indirect expropriation and jurisdiction disputes.The second part,combined with the current international investment situation,firstly studies the dispute of jurisdiction involved in this case,highlighting the role of jurisdiction such as property jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction in the effective adjudication of substantive disputes.Secondly,taking the essence of indirect expropriation ascertainment as the logical starting point,the author clarifies the boundary between indirect expropriation and government control measures without compensation.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2022年第2期139-150,共12页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
中国贸促会法律部《投资仲裁案例分析汇编》项目的部分研究成果。中国贸促会法律部部长刘超担任项目负责人。国家高端智库武汉大学国际法研究所教授、博士生导师漆彤担任项目课题组主持人
关键词
国际投资
管辖权
间接征收
比例原则
international investment
indirect expropriation
principle of proportionality
