摘要
我国现行立法并未规定临时仲裁制度,2021年《中华人民共和国仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》第91条则显示出有限度地开放临时仲裁的倾向,并以争议是否具有涉外因素实行临时仲裁“双轨制”。但该制度一方面需从制度设计本身进行调整,即与该意见稿第27条新增的“仲裁地”相兼容,以免出现无涉外因素争议当事人通过挑选仲裁地适用临时仲裁的制度设计矛盾。另一方面,构建及适用我国的临时仲裁制度时需注意当前的制度环境,例如当前部分仲裁规则与临时仲裁“双轨制”便存在潜在冲突。但上述问题并非不可调和,针对前者,可完善关于仲裁地的相关规定防止其对临时仲裁“双轨制”带来的可能风险。而针对后者,可完善相关仲裁机构的规定与我国临时仲裁制度进行融合,如在临时仲裁“双轨制”的制度设计下,建议完善相关仲裁机构的审查或确认规则。
China's current legislation does not provide for ad hoc arbitration.Article 91 of the"Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China(Revised)(Draft for Comments)"(2021)shows a tendency that the law will provide for ad hoc arbitration based on whether the dispute has foreign-related characteristics,which called"dual-track system".However,on the one hand,it must be compatible with the newly added"seat of arbitration"in Article 27 of the"Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China(Revised)(Draft for Comments)"(2021)to avoid that the parties to disputes without foreign-related factors apply for ad hoc arbitration by selecting a seat of arbitration.On the other hand,when constructing and applying China's ad hoc arbitration provisions,attention must be paid to the current institutional environment.For example,there are potential conflicts between some current arbitration rules and the"dual-track system"of ad hoc arbitration.Luckily,the conflicts are not irreconcilable.For the former,the relevant provisions on the seat of arbitration can be improved to prevent the possible risks it brings to the"dual-track system"of ad hoc arbitration.For the latter,the regulations of relevant arbitration institutions can be improved and integrated with China's ad hoc arbitration provisions.For example,under the system design of the"dual-track system"of ad hoc arbitration,it is recommended to improve the review or confirmation rules of relevant arbitration institutions and to be complied with the"dual-track system"of ad hoc arbitration.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2023年第6期40-54,共15页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
2021年重庆市高等教育教学改革研究重大项目“涉外法律人才培养的通识课程建设”(项目编号:211010)阶段性研究成果
关键词
《仲裁法》修订
临时仲裁
“双轨制”
仲裁地
revise of the PRC Arbitration Law
ad hoc arbitration
"dual-track system"
seat of arbitration
