摘要
丘吉尔矿业公司与行星矿业公司诉印度尼西亚案涉及的是采矿业的国际投资活动,核心法律争议是投资者是否以伪造许可证文件的方式进行了投资以及该案仲裁裁决是否应被撤销。在伪造许可证文件这一问题上,仲裁庭从法律事实与法律效果两个方面明确指出丘吉尔矿业公司与行星矿业公司的投资行为不具有合法性,因而不应受国际投资条约保护。在该案仲裁裁决生效后,丘吉尔矿业公司与行星矿业公司申请撤销裁决。该案撤销委员会详细讨论了国际投资仲裁中撤销裁决的主要情形并逐一反驳了丘吉尔矿业公司与行星矿业公司的不当主张。本案较为完整地呈现了国际投资仲裁的关键程序,撤销委员会的论证说理充分,能够为后续相关案件的当事人以及仲裁庭提供较为全面的参考。
The case Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v.Republic of Indonesia involves international investment activities in the mining industry.The core legal dispute revolves around whether the investors made their investments using forged permit documents and whether the arbitral award in this case should be annulled.On the issue of forged permit documents,the arbitral tribunal explicitly stated from both legal facts and legal effects that the investment of Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd lacks legitimacy and should therefore not be protected by international investment treaties.After the arbitral award in this case became effective,Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd applied for its annulment.The annulment committee thoroughly discussed the main grounds for the annulment of international investment arbitral awards and systematically refuted the unfounded claims made by the applicants.This case presents the key procedures of international investment arbitration in a relatively comprehensive manner.The reasoning of the annulment committee is well-founded,providing a valuable reference for the future parties involved and arbitral tribunals in related cases.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2024年第2期121-133,共13页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
中国贸促会法律部《投资仲裁案例分析汇编》项目的部分研究成果。国家高端智库武汉大学国际法研究所教授、博士生导师漆彤担任项目课题组主持人
关键词
国际投资仲裁
投资合法性
伪造文件
审慎义务
撤销裁决
international investment arbitration
legitimacy of investment
forgery of documents
due diligence
annulment of arbitral award
