摘要
目的分析泌尿外科后腹腔镜手术的护理配合情况。方法选择2018年10月至2019年7月海城市中心医院泌尿外科收治的接受后腹腔镜手术患者70例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组35例。观察组接受程序化护理干预,对照组接受常规护理。比较两组护理满意度以及相关指标。结果观察组护理满意度为94.26%,高于对照组的74.29%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组手术时间[(167.8±10.9)min vs(244.7±10.7)min]、术中出血量[(180.4±19.7)ml vs(250.3±15.7)ml]、肠功能恢复时间[(22.7±7.2)h vs(45.5±7.1)h]、术后住院时间[(6.3±0.3)d vs(19.3±0.4)d]优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论泌尿外科后腹腔镜手术的护理配合能够有效促进手术顺利进行。
Objective To analyze the nursing cooperation of retroperitoneallaparoscopic surgery in urology department.Methods From October 2018 to July 2019,70 patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology department of Haicheng Central Hospital were selected as the research objectsand randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 35 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with programmed nursing intervention,while the control group was treated withroutine nursing.The nursing satisfaction and related indicators of the two groups were compared.Results The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 94.26%,which was higher than that(74.29%)of the control group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the observation group was more superior in many terms,including the operation time[(167.8±10.9)min vs(244.7±10.7)min],intraoperative blood loss[(180.4±19.7)ml vs(250.3±15.7)ml],intestinal function recovery time[(22.7±7.2)h vs(45.5±7.1)h]and postoperative hospital stay[(6.3±0.3)d vs(19.3±0.4)d].There was statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Nursing cooperation in retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology departmentcan effectively make favorableoperation.
作者
王双
WANG Shuang(Department of Urology,Haicheng Central Hospital,Haicheng114200,China)
出处
《中国误诊学杂志》
CAS
2019年第10期465-467,共3页
Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
关键词
泌尿外科手术
腹腔镜检查
护理
surgery in urology department
laparoscopy
nursing
