摘要
公法与私法共同对违法建筑进行调整,在它们的分工合作中,公法管制起到主导作用,主要针对违法建筑的违法建设行为,以消除该行为的负面影响为目标;私法则具有配合的因应作用,指向违法建筑的利益形态及其交易,以合理定位和评价为任务。在公法管制中,违法建筑的认定标准不唯一,处置措施具有弹性,征收是否给予补偿存在矛盾,但确定无法办理不动产登记。与此相应,违法建筑应是私法认可的利益,建造人对违法建筑享有动产所有权,以违法建筑为标的物的合同也不因此无效。
Illegal Constructions fall into the scope jointly adjusted by public law and private law.From the perspective of their division and cooperation,regulation through public law plays a leading role and mainly targets at builders’illegal constructive behaviors that result in the birth of an illegal construction,aiming at eliminating the adverse impact of this behavior.However,private law represents a corresponding response function,and adjusts the diverse interests of illegal constructions and their transactions,taking legitimate orientation and evaluation as a mission.Under public law,identification standards for illegal constructions take on many forms and the disposal measures are flexible.Specifically,compensation for illegal construction expropriation remains uncertain,but inability in real estate registration is definite.Correspondingly,illegal constructions’interests are recognized by private law,and the builder has ownership in movable property form.Moreover,contracts with illegal constructions as the object are not invalid on these grounds。
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期78-87,共10页
Law Review
关键词
违法建筑
公私法衔接
管制
动产所有权
合同效力
Illegal Constructions
Integration of Public Law and Private Law
Public Law Regulation
Chattel Ownership
Validity of Contract
