摘要
司法实践中就建设工程优先受偿权的行使是否必须以合同有效为前提一直存在较为突出的争议。由于合同效力体系的不完善,以及对《民法典》第807条和相关司法解释的不同理解,否定说与肯定说应运而生。优先权作为对平等性债权的突破,其行使不仅应当严格地控制在一定的范围内,而且必须具备充足的正当性基础,如果一味地肯定无效合同可以行使建设工程优先受偿权无益于各债权人利益的均衡。合同无效作为法律对合同最为严厉的否定性评价,将无效合同等同于有效合同从而赋予其建设工程优先受偿权不具有正当性。因此,以有效合同作为其行使前提才能符合法学理论上的正当性要求。
In judicial practice,there has been a prominent dispute on whether the exercise of the right of priority to compensation for con-struction projects must be based on the validity of the contract.Due to the imperfection of the contract validity systemand the different understandings of Article 807 of the Civil Code and the relevant judicial interpretation,the theory of negation and affirmation arises at the historic moment.As a breakthrough of equal creditor’s rights,the exercise of priority should not only be strictly controlled within a certain scope,but also have a sufficient basis of justice.if we blindly affirm that the invalid contract can exercise the priority of com-pensation for the construction project,it is not conducive to the balance of the interests of the creditors.As the most severe negative evaluation of the contract by law,it is not legitimate to equate the invalid contract with the valid contract so as to give it the priority to receive compensation for the construction project.Therefore,taking the valid contract as the premise of its exercise can meet the requi-rements of legitimacy in legal theory.
作者
刘俊良
LIU Jun-liang(Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出处
《遵义师范学院学报》
2021年第4期45-49,共5页
Journal of Zunyi Normal University
关键词
合同效力
建设工程优先受偿权
诉的利益
正当性基础
validity of contract
priority of compensation for construction projects
interests of litigation
basis of legitimacy
