摘要
修改权的规范目的在于保障作者的修改自由。修改权既不是保护作品完整权的重复,也不是为了禁止程度轻于"篡改"的"小改"。对修改权的"中国式误读"不仅不合法理,也造成了裁判标准的不统一。对修改权的理解不仅事关是否废除该权利的立法选择,对其误读原因的分析,也能引发对法律解释方法的思考。
The right to modify in Copyright Law aims to guarantee the author’s freedom of modification. This right is neither the overlapping protection with the right of integrity, nor the right to prevent the illegal trivial modification that is less serious than the alteration which will infringe the right of integrity. The "Chinese misreading" on the right to modify is not only unreasonable in theory, but also resulted in the divergence of judicial decisions. The interpretation of right to modify will influence the choice of legislation in China as to the abolition or reserve of this right, and the study on why this right was misread in China is also inspiring to the methodology of legal interpretation.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第10期37-44,共8页
Intellectual Property
关键词
修改权
保护作品完整权
收回权
right to modify
right of integrity
right of retraction
