摘要
网络犯罪的帮助行为较传统犯罪的帮助行为出现了异化,依据传统共犯理论难以实现对网络帮助行为严重社会危害性及其较高独立性的充分评价,司法解释层面与立法层面均创制了网络帮助行为正犯化的归责模式。帮助行为正犯化与犯罪参与理论密切相关,实质客观说为帮助行为正犯化的创制提供了契机,但实质客观说与我国双层区分制抵牾,对我国共犯立法双层区分制的准确理解与坚守,可以避免一些不必要的帮助行为正犯化的立法。
The aiding in cybercrime, compared with that in traditional crimes, appears to be thoroughly varying. We can＇ t sufficiently evaluate the great harmfulness to society and higher independence of aiding in cybercrimes according to traditional theory of accomplice. Now the imputation models for taking the aider as principal offender have been established in levels of judicial interpretation and legislation. Taking the aider as principal offender is closely tied to the theory of crimi- nal participation, the standpoint based on the concept of substantial principal offender can afford opportunity for taking the aider as principal offender, contribute positively to correctly understand and adhere to two - layer differentiation of accomplice in China＇ s criminal law legislation, and avoid unnecessary legislation which takes the aider as principal offender.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期123-130,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
最高人民法院司法研究重大课题:(ZGFYKT201621)"网络信息保护及网络犯罪问题研究"
关键词
帮助行为正犯化
网络犯罪
犯罪参与
实质客观说
双层区分制
Taking the aider as principal offender
Cybercrime
Criminal participation
Concept of substantial principal offender
Two - layer differentiation
