期刊文献+

可以降低未成年人刑事责任年龄吗?——基于1010份调查问卷的实证考察 被引量:5

Can We Reduce the Age of Criminal Responsibility of Minors?——An Empirical Study Based on 1010 Questionnaires
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着未成年人犯罪案件的频繁曝光,越来越多的人开始质疑我国最低刑事责任年龄设置的合理性,要求降低或是设置弹性的年龄标准。然而,未成年人犯罪成因复杂多样,涉及家庭、学校、社会等多种因素,若想仅靠刑罚来规制,不但有转嫁责任于未成年人之嫌,还可能"治标不治本"。针对未成年人犯罪屡禁不止的问题,我们不应仅期望于通过降低最低刑事责任年龄、扩大犯罪圈来解决,而是应全面分析其犯罪成因,同时树立国家亲权和未成年人福利的司法理念,区分未成年人"罪错行为",创设非羁押性措施的适用体系,并适当扩大附条件不起诉的适用范围等,以期在刑罚之外寻找出一条解决问题的路径。 With the frequent exposure of juvenile crimes,more and more people are beginning to question the rationality of juvenile criminal responsibility age in China,and demand to reduce or set the flexible age standard.However,the causes of juvenile delinquency are complex and diverse,involving many factors including family,school,and society.If we want to rely solely on penalties to regulate,it is not only suspected of passing the responsibility to minors,but also may not cure the symptoms.In view of the more frequent juvenile crimes,we should not only hope to solve the problem by reducing the minimum age of criminal responsibility and expanding the criminal range.Instead,we should comprehensively analyze the causes of crimes and establish the judicial concept of state parental rights and welfare of minors,distinguish minors from"criminal acts",create a system of non-custodial measures,and appropriately expand the scope of application of conditional non-prosecutions,in order to find a path to solve problems outside the penalty.
作者 自正法 付丽萍 Zi Zhengfa;Fu Liping
机构地区 重庆大学法学院
出处 《人权研究(辑刊)》 2020年第1期285-313,571,共30页 Journal of Human Rights
基金 国家社科基金青年项目“未成年人刑事特别程序的理论、模式与完善路径研究”(项目编号:18CFX039)的阶段性成果
关键词 未成年人 刑事责任年龄 国家亲权 非羁押性措施 未成年人福利 Minors Age of Criminal Responsibility State Parental Rights Non-custodial Measures Welfare of Minors
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

二级参考文献232

共引文献735

引证文献5

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部