摘要
在系统功能语言学中,概念语法隐喻和人际语法隐喻作为意义扩展的两种模式,已经得到普遍认可。然而,逻辑语法隐喻自Martin(1992)提出后,却并未得到功能研究者的足够重视。本文在回顾语法隐喻的发展历程后,认为Martin所提出的逻辑语法隐喻具有深刻的内涵,其强调了与Halliday语法隐喻理论的互补性。但是,衔接型逻辑关系的隐喻表达并不属于逻辑语法隐喻范畴,进而揭示出逻辑语法隐喻的实质。从覆盖范围看,Martin的逻辑语法隐喻"名"不副"实"。最后,本文从两个方面论证了逻辑语法隐喻的重要理论价值和意义:1)Martin的逻辑语法隐喻是对Halliday概念语法隐喻体系中逻辑语法隐喻有"实"而无"名"的必要补充;2)逻辑语法隐喻体现形式多样,有利于消除"名词化是语法隐喻唯一的体现方式"的误解,从而丰富语法隐喻理论。
Ideational grammatical metaphor and interpersonal grammatical metaphor have been generally accepted as two modes of meaning expansion in Systemic Functional Linguistics.However,logical grammatical metaphor has not received its deserved attention since Martin(1992).The article reviews the development of grammatical metaphor and pinpoints the complementarity of logical grammatical metaphor to Halliday’s theory of grammatical metaphor.However,Martin’s cohesive metaphorical expressions are not logical grammatical metaphor.Hence the scope of Martin’s logical grammatical metaphor goes beyond clause complexes to include textual organization.Lastly,the theoretical significance of logical grammatical metaphor is corroborated in two respects:on the one hand,Martin’s logical grammatical metaphor is complementary to Halliday’s ideational grammatical metaphor;on the other hand,the different realizations of logical grammatical metaphor are helpful in eliminating the misinterpretation that nominalization is the only way to realize grammatical metaphor.
出处
《语言学研究》
2020年第2期66-80,共15页
Linguistic Research
关键词
概念语法隐喻
逻辑语法隐喻
互补性
ideational grammatical metaphor
logical grammatical metaphor
complementarity
