The new paradigm for technical prose rejects the conventional conveyor belt view and recognizes technical writing as not objective but persuasive and fundamentally rhetorical. For this reason, sci tech translation is ...The new paradigm for technical prose rejects the conventional conveyor belt view and recognizes technical writing as not objective but persuasive and fundamentally rhetorical. For this reason, sci tech translation is also persuasive and therefore far from uncreative or unimaginative. Based on the point of view of underlying unity of the arts and sciences, this paper discusses the relationship between sci tech translation and arts from the common rhetorical devices of literary works and technical prose and interpenetration between literary style and technical style. [展开更多
[目的]探讨显微镜辅助下颈前路椎间盘切除植骨融合（anterior cervical discectomy with fusion,ACDF）治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2011年5月～2012年10月手术治疗的60例单节段神经根型颈椎病患者的临床资料,根...[目的]探讨显微镜辅助下颈前路椎间盘切除植骨融合（anterior cervical discectomy with fusion,ACDF）治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2011年5月～2012年10月手术治疗的60例单节段神经根型颈椎病患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为两组：标准ACDF组（A组）和显微镜辅助ACDF组（B组）,A组30例,其中C_（4、5）14例,C_（5、6）8例C_（6、7）8例;B组30例,其中C_（4、5）12例,C_（5、6）10例、C_（6、7）8例。比较两组的手术时间、出血量、术前VAS评分、术后VAS评分、并发症发生情况,以JOA评分（17分法）及其改善率评价术后神经功能改善情况。[结果]手术时间A组为（66.40±10.8）min;B组为（81.35±10.3）min,t检验P值〈0.01,差异有统计学意义。出血量A组为（74±14.7）ml;B组为（59±12.5）ml,t检验P值=0.001,差异有统计学意义。A组VAS评分术前为（8.05±1.3）,术后为（1.80±1.0）,t检验P值〈0.01,差异有统计学意义;B组VAS评分术前为（8.50±1.3）,术后为（1.45±0.8）,t检验P值〈0.01,差异有统计学意义。A组JOA评分术前（10.65±1.35）分,术后12个月（15.60±0.88）分,改善率：（78.8±11.2）%;B组JOA评分术前（10.20±1.40）分;术后12个月（15.95±0.76）分,改善率：（85.2±10.1）%;A组和B组改善率t检验P值=0.067,差异无统计学意义。A组2例术后症状未见明显改善,B组所有患者术后症状明显改善,组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.49）。A组出现2例脑脊液漏,B组无脑脊液漏,组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.49）。[结论]标准ACDF和显微镜辅助ACDF是治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病有效的方法,但显微镜辅助ACDF可有效止血,减少出血量和并发症,是治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病优先选择的手术方法。展开更多
文摘The new paradigm for technical prose rejects the conventional conveyor belt view and recognizes technical writing as not objective but persuasive and fundamentally rhetorical. For this reason, sci tech translation is also persuasive and therefore far from uncreative or unimaginative. Based on the point of view of underlying unity of the arts and sciences, this paper discusses the relationship between sci tech translation and arts from the common rhetorical devices of literary works and technical prose and interpenetration between literary style and technical style. [
文摘[目的]探讨显微镜辅助下颈前路椎间盘切除植骨融合（anterior cervical discectomy with fusion,ACDF）治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2011年5月～2012年10月手术治疗的60例单节段神经根型颈椎病患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为两组：标准ACDF组（A组）和显微镜辅助ACDF组（B组）,A组30例,其中C_（4、5）14例,C_（5、6）8例C_（6、7）8例;B组30例,其中C_（4、5）12例,C_（5、6）10例、C_（6、7）8例。比较两组的手术时间、出血量、术前VAS评分、术后VAS评分、并发症发生情况,以JOA评分（17分法）及其改善率评价术后神经功能改善情况。[结果]手术时间A组为（66.40±10.8）min;B组为（81.35±10.3）min,t检验P值〈0.01,差异有统计学意义。出血量A组为（74±14.7）ml;B组为（59±12.5）ml,t检验P值=0.001,差异有统计学意义。A组VAS评分术前为（8.05±1.3）,术后为（1.80±1.0）,t检验P值〈0.01,差异有统计学意义;B组VAS评分术前为（8.50±1.3）,术后为（1.45±0.8）,t检验P值〈0.01,差异有统计学意义。A组JOA评分术前（10.65±1.35）分,术后12个月（15.60±0.88）分,改善率：（78.8±11.2）%;B组JOA评分术前（10.20±1.40）分;术后12个月（15.95±0.76）分,改善率：（85.2±10.1）%;A组和B组改善率t检验P值=0.067,差异无统计学意义。A组2例术后症状未见明显改善,B组所有患者术后症状明显改善,组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.49）。A组出现2例脑脊液漏,B组无脑脊液漏,组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.49）。[结论]标准ACDF和显微镜辅助ACDF是治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病有效的方法,但显微镜辅助ACDF可有效止血,减少出血量和并发症,是治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病优先选择的手术方法。
