目的采用Meta分析的方法评估我国性少数人群抑郁患病率。方法计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、PsycNet、PubMed、Web of Science数据库中公开发表的关于中国性少数人群抑郁相关文献,采用Stata17.0和RevMan5.4.1软件进行数据分析。结果...目的采用Meta分析的方法评估我国性少数人群抑郁患病率。方法计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、PsycNet、PubMed、Web of Science数据库中公开发表的关于中国性少数人群抑郁相关文献,采用Stata17.0和RevMan5.4.1软件进行数据分析。结果共纳入29篇文献,研究样本共13808例。Meta分析结果显示,我国性少数人群抑郁患病率为41.00%[95%CI(38.00%,45.00%),P<0.001]。亚组分析结果显示,男性和女性性少数人群的抑郁患病率分别为41.00%、52.00%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.030)。结论我国性少数人群抑郁患病率较高,且不同性别的性少数人群抑郁患病率存在一定差异。展开更多
目的:调查高校辅导员对同性恋者的态度,并分析态度差异的原因。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,对参与广东省普通高校某期思想政治教育骨干培训班的56所高校194名辅导员进行调查,以改编后的ATLG(the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Sc...目的:调查高校辅导员对同性恋者的态度,并分析态度差异的原因。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,对参与广东省普通高校某期思想政治教育骨干培训班的56所高校194名辅导员进行调查,以改编后的ATLG(the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale)量表作为工具。结果:(1)男性对同性恋者的态度较女性更加严厉,辅导员对男同性恋者的态度比对女同性恋者的态度更加严厉;(2)来自城市的辅导员态度更为宽容,来自乡镇农村的态度更为严厉;(3)独生子女对同性恋者的态度较为严厉;(4)接触过同性恋者的辅导员态度更为宽容。结论:高校辅导员对同性恋现象的认知存在误区,增加有关性学知识培训,有利于辅导员对同性恋者学生群体采取公正的态度和做好本职工作。展开更多
Background: Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual (LGB) are individuals who often experienced stigma and discrimination which has detrimental effects on psychological well-being. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the major...Background: Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual (LGB) are individuals who often experienced stigma and discrimination which has detrimental effects on psychological well-being. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the major stressors and psychological well-being of LGB among Chinese adults in Hong Kong. Methods: A cross-sectional study was employed using self-administered questionnaires. Convenience sampling was used to recruit subjects. Demographic information, Measure of Gay-related stress (MOGS) and The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D Scale) were used to collect data. Results: The major stressor among LGB individuals in Hong Kong was family reaction. Majority of them had a high level of depression. Conclusion: LGB individuals in Hong Kong experienced high level of depression.展开更多
<strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Japanese students and employed adults’ characteristic features, and sexual situation, and to find the correlated factors of lesbi...<strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Japanese students and employed adults’ characteristic features, and sexual situation, and to find the correlated factors of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) recognition in order to obtain suggestions for improved relationships with sexual minorities in a diversifying society. <strong>Methods:</strong> This quantitative cross-sectional descriptive correlational study occurred during 2018 to 2019 when 2210 questionnaires were distributed to a purposive sample of eligible participants. A total of 1534 completed questionnaires (69.4%) were returned, of which 1439 (65.1%) were suitable for analyses. The survey included respondents’ 1) characteristics, 2) sexual situation, and 3) LGBT recognition scale. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, and structural equation modeling. SPSS ver. 26.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis at a 5% significance level. <strong>Results:</strong> The LGBT recognition score was significantly affected by suffering from gender identity (standardized partial regression coefficient: β = 0.17, p < 0.001), age (β = <span style="white-space:nowrap;">−</span>0.19, p < 0.001), learning about LGBT experience (β = 0.29, p < 0.001), experience of disclosure from LGBT person (β = 0.14, p < 0.001), sexual problems with intimate relationship (β = 0.07, p < 0.001), and diversity penetration (β = 0.14, p < 0.05). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Suffering from gender identity, learning about LGBT experience, experience of disclosure from LGBT person, sexual problem with intimate relationship, and diversity penetration had a positive effect, whereas age had negative effects on the LGBT recognition score.展开更多
Background: This study aimed to identify the predictors of LGBT recognition by health sciences university students in Japan. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that used quantitative data collected from 481 retu...Background: This study aimed to identify the predictors of LGBT recognition by health sciences university students in Japan. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that used quantitative data collected from 481 returned self-report questionnaires distributed to 866 health sciences undergraduate and graduate students. The following survey item and scales were used for measuring the main outcomes: Thoughts about sexual identity, Empathy scale, Objectivity scale, and LGBT recognition scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple regression analyses. SPSS ver. 23.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis at a 5% significance level. Results: The number of returned questionnaires was 481 (55.5%). There was no significant difference in the LGBT recognition and the participant’s characteristics (e.g., age and medical history). The 5 significant predictors of LGBT recognition were: 1) Empathy (β = 0.19, p LGBT learning experience (β = 0.18, p Objectivity (β = 0.15, p Sexual problem with a close person (β = 0.13, p Suffering from gender identity (β = 0.09, p Conclusions: The predictive factors of LGBT recognition were Empathy, LGBT learning experience, Objectivity, Sexual problem with a close person, and Suffering from gender identity. Careful development and implementation of LGBT educational programs are needed to better understand the situations and ideas of LGBT parties to enhance their recognition.展开更多
文摘目的采用Meta分析的方法评估我国性少数人群抑郁患病率。方法计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、PsycNet、PubMed、Web of Science数据库中公开发表的关于中国性少数人群抑郁相关文献,采用Stata17.0和RevMan5.4.1软件进行数据分析。结果共纳入29篇文献,研究样本共13808例。Meta分析结果显示,我国性少数人群抑郁患病率为41.00%[95%CI(38.00%,45.00%),P<0.001]。亚组分析结果显示,男性和女性性少数人群的抑郁患病率分别为41.00%、52.00%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.030)。结论我国性少数人群抑郁患病率较高,且不同性别的性少数人群抑郁患病率存在一定差异。
文摘目的:调查高校辅导员对同性恋者的态度,并分析态度差异的原因。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,对参与广东省普通高校某期思想政治教育骨干培训班的56所高校194名辅导员进行调查,以改编后的ATLG(the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale)量表作为工具。结果:(1)男性对同性恋者的态度较女性更加严厉,辅导员对男同性恋者的态度比对女同性恋者的态度更加严厉;(2)来自城市的辅导员态度更为宽容,来自乡镇农村的态度更为严厉;(3)独生子女对同性恋者的态度较为严厉;(4)接触过同性恋者的辅导员态度更为宽容。结论:高校辅导员对同性恋现象的认知存在误区,增加有关性学知识培训,有利于辅导员对同性恋者学生群体采取公正的态度和做好本职工作。
文摘Background: Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual (LGB) are individuals who often experienced stigma and discrimination which has detrimental effects on psychological well-being. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the major stressors and psychological well-being of LGB among Chinese adults in Hong Kong. Methods: A cross-sectional study was employed using self-administered questionnaires. Convenience sampling was used to recruit subjects. Demographic information, Measure of Gay-related stress (MOGS) and The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D Scale) were used to collect data. Results: The major stressor among LGB individuals in Hong Kong was family reaction. Majority of them had a high level of depression. Conclusion: LGB individuals in Hong Kong experienced high level of depression.
文摘<strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Japanese students and employed adults’ characteristic features, and sexual situation, and to find the correlated factors of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) recognition in order to obtain suggestions for improved relationships with sexual minorities in a diversifying society. <strong>Methods:</strong> This quantitative cross-sectional descriptive correlational study occurred during 2018 to 2019 when 2210 questionnaires were distributed to a purposive sample of eligible participants. A total of 1534 completed questionnaires (69.4%) were returned, of which 1439 (65.1%) were suitable for analyses. The survey included respondents’ 1) characteristics, 2) sexual situation, and 3) LGBT recognition scale. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, and structural equation modeling. SPSS ver. 26.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis at a 5% significance level. <strong>Results:</strong> The LGBT recognition score was significantly affected by suffering from gender identity (standardized partial regression coefficient: β = 0.17, p < 0.001), age (β = <span style="white-space:nowrap;">−</span>0.19, p < 0.001), learning about LGBT experience (β = 0.29, p < 0.001), experience of disclosure from LGBT person (β = 0.14, p < 0.001), sexual problems with intimate relationship (β = 0.07, p < 0.001), and diversity penetration (β = 0.14, p < 0.05). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Suffering from gender identity, learning about LGBT experience, experience of disclosure from LGBT person, sexual problem with intimate relationship, and diversity penetration had a positive effect, whereas age had negative effects on the LGBT recognition score.
文摘Background: This study aimed to identify the predictors of LGBT recognition by health sciences university students in Japan. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that used quantitative data collected from 481 returned self-report questionnaires distributed to 866 health sciences undergraduate and graduate students. The following survey item and scales were used for measuring the main outcomes: Thoughts about sexual identity, Empathy scale, Objectivity scale, and LGBT recognition scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple regression analyses. SPSS ver. 23.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis at a 5% significance level. Results: The number of returned questionnaires was 481 (55.5%). There was no significant difference in the LGBT recognition and the participant’s characteristics (e.g., age and medical history). The 5 significant predictors of LGBT recognition were: 1) Empathy (β = 0.19, p LGBT learning experience (β = 0.18, p Objectivity (β = 0.15, p Sexual problem with a close person (β = 0.13, p Suffering from gender identity (β = 0.09, p Conclusions: The predictive factors of LGBT recognition were Empathy, LGBT learning experience, Objectivity, Sexual problem with a close person, and Suffering from gender identity. Careful development and implementation of LGBT educational programs are needed to better understand the situations and ideas of LGBT parties to enhance their recognition.
