AIM： To clarify the risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR）. METHODS： A total of 297 consecutive patients who underwent EMR were enrolled. Some of the patients had multiple lesions. Blee...AIM： To clarify the risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR）. METHODS： A total of 297 consecutive patients who underwent EMR were enrolled. Some of the patients had multiple lesions. Bleeding requiring endoscopic treatment was defined as bleeding after EMR. Odds ratios （OR） with 95% confidence intervals （CI）, calculated by logistic regression with multivariate adjustments for covariates, were the measures of association. RESULTS： Of the 297 patients, 57 （19.2%） patients with bleeding after EMR were confirmed. With multivariate adjustment, the cutting method of EMR, diameter, and endoscopic pattern of the tumor were associated with the risk of bleeding after EMR. The multivariate-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR using endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy was 3.07 （95%CI, 1.59-5.92） compared with strip biopsy. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for the highest quartile （16-50 mm） of tumor diameter was 5.63 （95%CI, 1.84-17.23） compared with that for the lowest （4-7 mm）. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for depressed type of tumor was 4.21 （95%CI, 1.75-10.10） compared with elevated type. CONCLUSION： It is important to take tumor charactedstics （tumor size and endoscopic pattern） and cutting method of EMR into consideration in predicting bleeding after EMR.展开更多
BACKGROUND The abdominal perineal resection(APR),historically referred to as Mile’s proce-dure,stands as a time-honored surgical intervention for rectal cancer manage-ment.Advancements in surgical techniques and the ...BACKGROUND The abdominal perineal resection(APR),historically referred to as Mile’s proce-dure,stands as a time-honored surgical intervention for rectal cancer manage-ment.Advancements in surgical techniques and the advent of neoadjuvant therapies have significantly improved the rate of sphincter preservation among patients afflicted with rectal cancer,including those with ultralow rectal cancer.Despite these improvements,APR maintains its irreplaceable role in the clinical landscape,particularly for cases involving low rectal cancer with encroachment on the external anal sphincter or levator ani muscles.Optimal perineal exposure stands as a pivotal phase in APR,given that the precision of this maneuver is directly correlated with both the safety of the surgery and the patient’s subse-quent long-term prognosis.AIM To evaluate the value of Lone-Star retractor(LSR)perineal exposure method in the treatment for laparoscopic APR of rectal cancer.METHODS We reviewed the records of 38 patients with rectal cancer at Anqing Municipal Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023,including 20 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a LSR perineal exposure method(LSR group)and 18 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a conventional perineal exposure method(control group).In the LSR group,following incision of the skin and subcutaneous tissue,the LSR was placed and dynamically adjusted according to the surgical plane to fully expose the perineal operative field.RESULTS A total of 38 patients underwent laparoscopic APR,none of whom were found to have distant metastasis upon intraoperative exploration.Perineal blood loss,the postoperative hospital stays and the wound pain scores in the LSR group were significantly lower than those in the control group.A single surgeon completed the perineal operation significantly more often in the LSR group than in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of infection via the perineal incision in the LSR group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).No ca展开更多
BACKGROUND Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method(R-NOSES I-F)is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer.However,the curre...BACKGROUND Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method(R-NOSES I-F)is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer.However,the current literature on this method is limited to case reports,and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted.AIM To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer.METHODS From September 2018 to February 2022,206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis.Of these patients,22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery(RNOSES I-F group)and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection(RLRC group).Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed.Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.RESULTS Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1(1.7±0.7 vs 2.2±0.6,P=0.003)and shorter postoperative anal venting time(2.7±0.6 vs 3.5±0.7,P<0.001)than those in the RLRC group.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex,age,body mass index,tumor size,TNM stage,operative time,intrao-perative bleeding,postoperative complications,or inflammatory response(P>0.05).Postoperative anal and urinary functions,as assessed by Wexner,low anterior resection syndrome,and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores,were similar in both groups(P>0.05).Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer.It improves pain relief,promotes gastrointestinal function recovery,and helps avoid incision-related complications.展开更多
目的探讨结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变的内镜下特点。方法回顾性分析我院2020年1月至2022年7月完成肠镜检查者,所有患者均在发现结肠息肉时立即予以切除治疗并送活检,分析无蒂锯齿状息肉(SSL)的临床及内镜特征,切除方式等。结果共完成筛查性结...目的探讨结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变的内镜下特点。方法回顾性分析我院2020年1月至2022年7月完成肠镜检查者,所有患者均在发现结肠息肉时立即予以切除治疗并送活检,分析无蒂锯齿状息肉(SSL)的临床及内镜特征,切除方式等。结果共完成筛查性结肠镜检查36904例,锯齿状息肉患者4876例,其中无蒂锯齿状病变284例,SSL检出率(SDR)0.77%,SSL占锯齿状息肉比例约5.8%,左半结肠SSL构成比为28.5%,右半结肠SSL构成比为71.5%,直径≤5 mm 29.6%,6~9 mm 45.5%,10~19 mm 18.4%,≥20 mm 6.5%。其中41.2%SSL合并腺瘤,高危腺瘤占13.4%,低危腺瘤占27.8%,33.5%同步多发SSL,6%SSL伴异型增生。SSL的切除方式选择,冷切除占60.2%,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)为29.9%,内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)为8.1%,外科切除为1.8%。结论锯齿状病变的检出率可能在筛查性结肠镜检查中被低估了,因此,我们需要结合更多的方式以提高锯齿状病变的检出率。展开更多
BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas(SPN)is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women.AIM To evaluate the impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods(PPMs,including enucleation and cent...BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas(SPN)is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women.AIM To evaluate the impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods(PPMs,including enucleation and central pancreatectomy)in the treatment of SPN patients.METHODS From 2013 to 2019,patients who underwent pancreatectomy for SPNs were retrospectively reviewed.The baseline characteristics,intraoperative index,pathological outcomes,short-term complications and long-term follow-up data were compared between the PPM group and the conventional method(CM)group.RESULTS In total,166 patients were included in this study.Of them,33 patients(19.9%)underwent PPM.Most of the tumors(104/166,62.7%)were found accidentally.Comparing the parameters between groups,the hospital stay d(12.35 vs 13.5 d,P=0.49),total expense(44213 vs 54084 yuan,P=0.21),operation duration(135 vs 120 min,P=0.71),and intraoperative bleeding volume(200 vs 100 mL,P=0.49)did not differ between groups.Regarding pathological outcomes,tumor size(45 vs 32 mm,P=0.07),Ki67 index(P=0.53),peripheral tissue invasion(11.3%vs 9.1%,P=0.43)and positive margin status(7.5%vs 6%,P=0.28)also did not differ between groups.Moreover,PPM did not increase the risk of severe postoperative pancreatic fistula(3.8%vs 3.0%,P=0.85)or tumor recurrence(3.0%vs 6.0%,P=0.39).However,the number of patients who had exocrine insufficiency during follow-up was significantly lower in the PPM group(21.8%vs 3%,P=0.024).CM was identified as an independent risk factor for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency(odds ratio=8.195,95%confident interval:1.067-62.93).CONCLUSION PPM for SPN appears to be feasible and safe for preserving the exocrine function of the pancreas.展开更多
文摘AIM： To clarify the risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR）. METHODS： A total of 297 consecutive patients who underwent EMR were enrolled. Some of the patients had multiple lesions. Bleeding requiring endoscopic treatment was defined as bleeding after EMR. Odds ratios （OR） with 95% confidence intervals （CI）, calculated by logistic regression with multivariate adjustments for covariates, were the measures of association. RESULTS： Of the 297 patients, 57 （19.2%） patients with bleeding after EMR were confirmed. With multivariate adjustment, the cutting method of EMR, diameter, and endoscopic pattern of the tumor were associated with the risk of bleeding after EMR. The multivariate-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR using endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy was 3.07 （95%CI, 1.59-5.92） compared with strip biopsy. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for the highest quartile （16-50 mm） of tumor diameter was 5.63 （95%CI, 1.84-17.23） compared with that for the lowest （4-7 mm）. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for depressed type of tumor was 4.21 （95%CI, 1.75-10.10） compared with elevated type. CONCLUSION： It is important to take tumor charactedstics （tumor size and endoscopic pattern） and cutting method of EMR into consideration in predicting bleeding after EMR.
基金the Research Projects Foundation at Universities of Anhui Province,No.2023AH050577Research Projects Foundation at the Science and Technology Bureau of Anqing City,No.2023Z1001.
文摘BACKGROUND The abdominal perineal resection(APR),historically referred to as Mile’s proce-dure,stands as a time-honored surgical intervention for rectal cancer manage-ment.Advancements in surgical techniques and the advent of neoadjuvant therapies have significantly improved the rate of sphincter preservation among patients afflicted with rectal cancer,including those with ultralow rectal cancer.Despite these improvements,APR maintains its irreplaceable role in the clinical landscape,particularly for cases involving low rectal cancer with encroachment on the external anal sphincter or levator ani muscles.Optimal perineal exposure stands as a pivotal phase in APR,given that the precision of this maneuver is directly correlated with both the safety of the surgery and the patient’s subse-quent long-term prognosis.AIM To evaluate the value of Lone-Star retractor(LSR)perineal exposure method in the treatment for laparoscopic APR of rectal cancer.METHODS We reviewed the records of 38 patients with rectal cancer at Anqing Municipal Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023,including 20 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a LSR perineal exposure method(LSR group)and 18 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a conventional perineal exposure method(control group).In the LSR group,following incision of the skin and subcutaneous tissue,the LSR was placed and dynamically adjusted according to the surgical plane to fully expose the perineal operative field.RESULTS A total of 38 patients underwent laparoscopic APR,none of whom were found to have distant metastasis upon intraoperative exploration.Perineal blood loss,the postoperative hospital stays and the wound pain scores in the LSR group were significantly lower than those in the control group.A single surgeon completed the perineal operation significantly more often in the LSR group than in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of infection via the perineal incision in the LSR group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).No ca
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81860519.
文摘BACKGROUND Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method(R-NOSES I-F)is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer.However,the current literature on this method is limited to case reports,and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted.AIM To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer.METHODS From September 2018 to February 2022,206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis.Of these patients,22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery(RNOSES I-F group)and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection(RLRC group).Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed.Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.RESULTS Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1(1.7±0.7 vs 2.2±0.6,P=0.003)and shorter postoperative anal venting time(2.7±0.6 vs 3.5±0.7,P<0.001)than those in the RLRC group.There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex,age,body mass index,tumor size,TNM stage,operative time,intrao-perative bleeding,postoperative complications,or inflammatory response(P>0.05).Postoperative anal and urinary functions,as assessed by Wexner,low anterior resection syndrome,and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores,were similar in both groups(P>0.05).Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer.It improves pain relief,promotes gastrointestinal function recovery,and helps avoid incision-related complications.
文摘目的探讨结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变的内镜下特点。方法回顾性分析我院2020年1月至2022年7月完成肠镜检查者,所有患者均在发现结肠息肉时立即予以切除治疗并送活检,分析无蒂锯齿状息肉(SSL)的临床及内镜特征,切除方式等。结果共完成筛查性结肠镜检查36904例,锯齿状息肉患者4876例,其中无蒂锯齿状病变284例,SSL检出率(SDR)0.77%,SSL占锯齿状息肉比例约5.8%,左半结肠SSL构成比为28.5%,右半结肠SSL构成比为71.5%,直径≤5 mm 29.6%,6~9 mm 45.5%,10~19 mm 18.4%,≥20 mm 6.5%。其中41.2%SSL合并腺瘤,高危腺瘤占13.4%,低危腺瘤占27.8%,33.5%同步多发SSL,6%SSL伴异型增生。SSL的切除方式选择,冷切除占60.2%,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)为29.9%,内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)为8.1%,外科切除为1.8%。结论锯齿状病变的检出率可能在筛查性结肠镜检查中被低估了,因此,我们需要结合更多的方式以提高锯齿状病变的检出率。
文摘BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas(SPN)is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women.AIM To evaluate the impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods(PPMs,including enucleation and central pancreatectomy)in the treatment of SPN patients.METHODS From 2013 to 2019,patients who underwent pancreatectomy for SPNs were retrospectively reviewed.The baseline characteristics,intraoperative index,pathological outcomes,short-term complications and long-term follow-up data were compared between the PPM group and the conventional method(CM)group.RESULTS In total,166 patients were included in this study.Of them,33 patients(19.9%)underwent PPM.Most of the tumors(104/166,62.7%)were found accidentally.Comparing the parameters between groups,the hospital stay d(12.35 vs 13.5 d,P=0.49),total expense(44213 vs 54084 yuan,P=0.21),operation duration(135 vs 120 min,P=0.71),and intraoperative bleeding volume(200 vs 100 mL,P=0.49)did not differ between groups.Regarding pathological outcomes,tumor size(45 vs 32 mm,P=0.07),Ki67 index(P=0.53),peripheral tissue invasion(11.3%vs 9.1%,P=0.43)and positive margin status(7.5%vs 6%,P=0.28)also did not differ between groups.Moreover,PPM did not increase the risk of severe postoperative pancreatic fistula(3.8%vs 3.0%,P=0.85)or tumor recurrence(3.0%vs 6.0%,P=0.39).However,the number of patients who had exocrine insufficiency during follow-up was significantly lower in the PPM group(21.8%vs 3%,P=0.024).CM was identified as an independent risk factor for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency(odds ratio=8.195,95%confident interval:1.067-62.93).CONCLUSION PPM for SPN appears to be feasible and safe for preserving the exocrine function of the pancreas.
