Objective: Studying sub endometrial vascularity and blood flow in cases using intrauterine contraceptive devices for contraception with and without menorrhagia compared to cases not using intrauterine contraceptive de...Objective: Studying sub endometrial vascularity and blood flow in cases using intrauterine contraceptive devices for contraception with and without menorrhagia compared to cases not using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Methods: Three hundred and fifteen women attending gynecology and family planning outpatient clinics in the maternity hospital, Ain Shams University were included in the study. They were classified into three groups, 105 women using IUCD with menorrhagia (group I), 105 women using IUCD without menorrhagia (group II), and 105 normal controls not using IUCD (group III). After excluding local causes for bleeding, blood disease or any medical disorders, transvaginal ultrasound including three dimensional power Doppler (3DPD) ultrasound was done for all women. Right and left uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) were calculated, subednometrial blood flow RI and PI were obtained then 3DPD Vascular indices (VI, FI and VFI) of subendometrial blood flow were obtained for all cases. Statistical analysis was done to compare between the three groups. Results: A significant statistical difference was found as regards subendometrial vascularity indices, while there was no difference as regards bilateral uterine arteries Doppler indices in the three groups. Conclusion: Subendometrial vascularity in cases of menorrhagia with IUCD was markedly higher than in cases without menorrhagia and cases with no IUCD. 3DPD may be used for selection of cases prior to insertion of IUCD.展开更多
文摘Objective: Studying sub endometrial vascularity and blood flow in cases using intrauterine contraceptive devices for contraception with and without menorrhagia compared to cases not using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Methods: Three hundred and fifteen women attending gynecology and family planning outpatient clinics in the maternity hospital, Ain Shams University were included in the study. They were classified into three groups, 105 women using IUCD with menorrhagia (group I), 105 women using IUCD without menorrhagia (group II), and 105 normal controls not using IUCD (group III). After excluding local causes for bleeding, blood disease or any medical disorders, transvaginal ultrasound including three dimensional power Doppler (3DPD) ultrasound was done for all women. Right and left uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) were calculated, subednometrial blood flow RI and PI were obtained then 3DPD Vascular indices (VI, FI and VFI) of subendometrial blood flow were obtained for all cases. Statistical analysis was done to compare between the three groups. Results: A significant statistical difference was found as regards subendometrial vascularity indices, while there was no difference as regards bilateral uterine arteries Doppler indices in the three groups. Conclusion: Subendometrial vascularity in cases of menorrhagia with IUCD was markedly higher than in cases without menorrhagia and cases with no IUCD. 3DPD may be used for selection of cases prior to insertion of IUCD.
文摘目的比较防粘连剂联合宫内节育器(intrauterine device,IUD)、几丁糖联合IUD及IUD三种方法对预防中重度宫腔粘连分离术后再次粘连的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年12月至2018年12月于广州医科大学附属第三医院妇产科门诊行宫腔镜下粘连分离术(transcervical resection of adhesions,TCRA)的中重度宫腔粘连患者共241例,其中A组为空白组(57例),B组为IUD组(58例),C组为IUD+防粘连剂组(64例),D组IUD+几丁糖组(62例)。使用AFS评分诊断宫腔粘连程度。所有患者术后第2个月均行第二次宫腔镜检查,比较4组患者AFS改善值、宫腔再次粘连发生率。结果4组AFS改善值及再粘连发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两两比较,防粘连剂+IUD组(5.82±2.00)与防粘连剂+几丁糖组(5.48±2.09)相同,显著优于IUD组(4.33±2.42)及空白组(4.15±1.65)。IUD+防粘连剂组(40.3%)再次粘连发生率与IUD+几丁糖组(42.2%)相同,均显著低于IUD组(60.3%)及空白组(61.4%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中重度宫腔粘连分离术后,IUD联合防粘连剂或几丁糖,均可明显改善粘连程度,降低再粘连发生率。
