Individualized treatment is a basic feature of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), and individualized efficacy evaluation is also emphasized in TCM clinical practice. Individualized evaluation is in favor of improving ...Individualized treatment is a basic feature of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), and individualized efficacy evaluation is also emphasized in TCM clinical practice. Individualized evaluation is in favor of improving intervention continuously, and optimizing the TCM evidenceusing pattern gradually. Traditional case reports can better demonstrate the efficacy of individual, but lack of standardized design, making such evidence show a lower quality. Meanings, objectives and design elements of TCM individualized evaluation were discussed in this paper.Then based on the original work, design ideas and framework of TCM evidence-based case reporting system were established preliminarily.This work will improve the methodology of TCM individualized evaluation to realize the goal of optimizing TCM clinical evidence-using pattern.展开更多
目的:系统评价冠心病患者根据实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗的有效性和安全性,为临床个体化抗血小板治疗提供参考。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索时限为各数据库建库起至2018年2月,收集冠心病患者基于实...目的:系统评价冠心病患者根据实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗的有效性和安全性,为临床个体化抗血小板治疗提供参考。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索时限为各数据库建库起至2018年2月,收集冠心病患者基于实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗对比常规抗血小板治疗的随机对照试验(RCT),提取资料并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.2.0进行质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5.3统计软件对主要心血管不良事件、全因死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓、卒中、严重出血等指标的发生率进行Meta分析,并对不同种族、实验室检测方法和干预疗程进行亚组分析。结果:共纳入7项RCT,合计8 615例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与常规抗血小板治疗方案相比,基于实验室检测结果的个体化抗血小板治疗患者的主要心血管不良事件[RR=0.93,95%CI(0.74,1.16),P=0.51]、全因死亡[RR=0.89,95%CI(0.56,1.41),P=0.61]、心血管死亡[RR=0.68,95%CI(0.36,1.25),P=0.21]、心肌梗死[RR=1.03,95%CI(0.92,1.16),P=0.56]、支架血栓[RR=0.52,95%CI(0.22,1.24),P=0.14]、卒中[RR=1.03,95%CI(0.65,1.63),P=0.90]和严重出血[RR=0.78,95%CI(0.53,1.14),P=0.20]发生率均无显著性差异。亚组分析结果显示根据CYP2C19基因型进行个体化给药可显著降低主要心血管不良事件发生率[RR=0.29,95%CI(0.14,0.64),P=0.002]和全因死亡发生率[RR=0.11,95%CI(0.01,0.87),P=0.04],而干预疗程达6个月可显著降低全因死亡发生率[RR=0.11,95%CI(0.01,0.87),P=0.04],其余亚组分析中两组患者的各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:与常规抗血小板治疗方案相比,对于冠心病患者基于实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗并不能显著降低主要心血管不良事件和出血的发生风险。虽然亚组分析显示根据CYP2C19基因型进行个体化给药可显著减少主要心血管不良事件和心血管死亡的发生风险,�展开更多
基金supported by Special Fund for Traditional Chinese Medicine Research in the Public Interest[201507006-01]
文摘Individualized treatment is a basic feature of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), and individualized efficacy evaluation is also emphasized in TCM clinical practice. Individualized evaluation is in favor of improving intervention continuously, and optimizing the TCM evidenceusing pattern gradually. Traditional case reports can better demonstrate the efficacy of individual, but lack of standardized design, making such evidence show a lower quality. Meanings, objectives and design elements of TCM individualized evaluation were discussed in this paper.Then based on the original work, design ideas and framework of TCM evidence-based case reporting system were established preliminarily.This work will improve the methodology of TCM individualized evaluation to realize the goal of optimizing TCM clinical evidence-using pattern.
文摘目的:系统评价冠心病患者根据实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗的有效性和安全性,为临床个体化抗血小板治疗提供参考。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索时限为各数据库建库起至2018年2月,收集冠心病患者基于实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗对比常规抗血小板治疗的随机对照试验(RCT),提取资料并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.2.0进行质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5.3统计软件对主要心血管不良事件、全因死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓、卒中、严重出血等指标的发生率进行Meta分析,并对不同种族、实验室检测方法和干预疗程进行亚组分析。结果:共纳入7项RCT,合计8 615例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与常规抗血小板治疗方案相比,基于实验室检测结果的个体化抗血小板治疗患者的主要心血管不良事件[RR=0.93,95%CI(0.74,1.16),P=0.51]、全因死亡[RR=0.89,95%CI(0.56,1.41),P=0.61]、心血管死亡[RR=0.68,95%CI(0.36,1.25),P=0.21]、心肌梗死[RR=1.03,95%CI(0.92,1.16),P=0.56]、支架血栓[RR=0.52,95%CI(0.22,1.24),P=0.14]、卒中[RR=1.03,95%CI(0.65,1.63),P=0.90]和严重出血[RR=0.78,95%CI(0.53,1.14),P=0.20]发生率均无显著性差异。亚组分析结果显示根据CYP2C19基因型进行个体化给药可显著降低主要心血管不良事件发生率[RR=0.29,95%CI(0.14,0.64),P=0.002]和全因死亡发生率[RR=0.11,95%CI(0.01,0.87),P=0.04],而干预疗程达6个月可显著降低全因死亡发生率[RR=0.11,95%CI(0.01,0.87),P=0.04],其余亚组分析中两组患者的各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:与常规抗血小板治疗方案相比,对于冠心病患者基于实验室检测结果进行个体化抗血小板治疗并不能显著降低主要心血管不良事件和出血的发生风险。虽然亚组分析显示根据CYP2C19基因型进行个体化给药可显著减少主要心血管不良事件和心血管死亡的发生风险,�
