【目的】分析第三方网站“发表记”中作者对学术期刊的投稿评论,揭示作者对期刊的投稿认知和情感感知,为期刊改进工作效能提供参考。【方法】利用八爪鱼爬虫软件爬取作者评论数据,使用文本分析法并借助ROST CM 6.0软件进行分词和词频分...【目的】分析第三方网站“发表记”中作者对学术期刊的投稿评论,揭示作者对期刊的投稿认知和情感感知,为期刊改进工作效能提供参考。【方法】利用八爪鱼爬虫软件爬取作者评论数据,使用文本分析法并借助ROST CM 6.0软件进行分词和词频分析,构建语义网络并进行情感分析。【结果】大部分学术期刊并无投稿评论,大部分有评论的期刊是核心期刊,且社科期刊数量较多。作者关注的高频词包括投稿结果、审稿过程、稿件处理周期、与编辑部沟通、费用问题、选题偏好、学历职称偏好等。作者评论数据的语义网络呈现出“核心-边缘”的层级结构。作者评论内容以正向情感为主,中性情感居第二位,负向情感最少。【结论】期刊的审稿速度、出版时效、沟通态度、收费标准是最显著的投稿认知与作者评论的影响因素。期刊应当重视作者的投稿感受,建构良好的投稿形象,吸引并留住优秀作者群体;完善现有期刊管理体制,充分发挥学术共同体的作用;重视同行评议,保证期刊审稿质量;建立健全与作者的沟通机制,及时反馈审阅意见。展开更多
AIM:To investigate whether perceptions of task difficulty on neuropsychological tests predicted academic achievement after controlling for glucose levels and depression.METHODS :Participants were type 1 diabetic adole...AIM:To investigate whether perceptions of task difficulty on neuropsychological tests predicted academic achievement after controlling for glucose levels and depression.METHODS :Participants were type 1 diabetic adolescents,with a mean age = 12.5 years(23 females and 16 males),seen at a northwest suburban Chicago hospital.The sample population was free of comorbid clinical health conditions.Subjects completed a three-part neuropsychological battery including the Digit Symbol Task,Trail Making Test,and Controlled Oral Word Association test.Following each task,individuals rated task difficulty and then completed a depression inventory.Performance on these three tests is reflective of neuropsychological status in relation to glucose control.Blood glucose levels were measured immediately prior to and after completing the neuropsychological battery using a glucose meter.Hb A1 c levels were obtained from medical records.Academic performance was based on self-reported grades in Math,Science,and English.Data was analyzed using multiple regression models to evaluate the associations between academic performance,perception of task difficulty,and glucose control.RESULTS:Perceptions of difficulty on a neuropsychological battery significantly predicted academic performance after accounting for glucose control and depression.Perceptions of difficulty on the neuropsychological tests were inversely correlated with academic performance(r =-0.48),while acute(blood glucose) and long-term glucose levels increased along with perceptions of task difficulty(r = 0.47).Additionally,higher depression scores were associatedwith poorer academic performance(r =-0.43).With the first regression analysis,perception of difficulty on the neuropsychological tasks contributed to 8% of the variance in academic performance after controlling for peripheral blood glucose and depression.In the second regression analysis,perception of difficulty accounted for 11% of the variance after accounting for academic performance and depression.The final regressio展开更多
文摘【目的】分析第三方网站“发表记”中作者对学术期刊的投稿评论,揭示作者对期刊的投稿认知和情感感知,为期刊改进工作效能提供参考。【方法】利用八爪鱼爬虫软件爬取作者评论数据,使用文本分析法并借助ROST CM 6.0软件进行分词和词频分析,构建语义网络并进行情感分析。【结果】大部分学术期刊并无投稿评论,大部分有评论的期刊是核心期刊,且社科期刊数量较多。作者关注的高频词包括投稿结果、审稿过程、稿件处理周期、与编辑部沟通、费用问题、选题偏好、学历职称偏好等。作者评论数据的语义网络呈现出“核心-边缘”的层级结构。作者评论内容以正向情感为主,中性情感居第二位,负向情感最少。【结论】期刊的审稿速度、出版时效、沟通态度、收费标准是最显著的投稿认知与作者评论的影响因素。期刊应当重视作者的投稿感受,建构良好的投稿形象,吸引并留住优秀作者群体;完善现有期刊管理体制,充分发挥学术共同体的作用;重视同行评议,保证期刊审稿质量;建立健全与作者的沟通机制,及时反馈审阅意见。
文摘AIM:To investigate whether perceptions of task difficulty on neuropsychological tests predicted academic achievement after controlling for glucose levels and depression.METHODS :Participants were type 1 diabetic adolescents,with a mean age = 12.5 years(23 females and 16 males),seen at a northwest suburban Chicago hospital.The sample population was free of comorbid clinical health conditions.Subjects completed a three-part neuropsychological battery including the Digit Symbol Task,Trail Making Test,and Controlled Oral Word Association test.Following each task,individuals rated task difficulty and then completed a depression inventory.Performance on these three tests is reflective of neuropsychological status in relation to glucose control.Blood glucose levels were measured immediately prior to and after completing the neuropsychological battery using a glucose meter.Hb A1 c levels were obtained from medical records.Academic performance was based on self-reported grades in Math,Science,and English.Data was analyzed using multiple regression models to evaluate the associations between academic performance,perception of task difficulty,and glucose control.RESULTS:Perceptions of difficulty on a neuropsychological battery significantly predicted academic performance after accounting for glucose control and depression.Perceptions of difficulty on the neuropsychological tests were inversely correlated with academic performance(r =-0.48),while acute(blood glucose) and long-term glucose levels increased along with perceptions of task difficulty(r = 0.47).Additionally,higher depression scores were associatedwith poorer academic performance(r =-0.43).With the first regression analysis,perception of difficulty on the neuropsychological tasks contributed to 8% of the variance in academic performance after controlling for peripheral blood glucose and depression.In the second regression analysis,perception of difficulty accounted for 11% of the variance after accounting for academic performance and depression.The final regressio
