Background Evidence indicates that early reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） reduces complications. This study was undertaken to compare the in-hospital delay to primary p...Background Evidence indicates that early reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） reduces complications. This study was undertaken to compare the in-hospital delay to primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PPCI） for patients with STEMI between specialized hospitals and non-specialized hospitals in Beijing, China. Methods Two specialized hospitals and fifteen non-specialized hospitals capable of performing PPCI were selected to participate in this study. A total of 308 patients, within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms and undergoing PPCI between November 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006 were enrolled. Data were collected by structured interview and review of medical records.Results The median in-hospital delay was 98 （interquartile range 105 to 180） minutes, and 16.9% of the patients were treated within 90 minutes. Total in-hospital delay and ECG-to-treatment decision-making time were longer in the non-specialized hospitals than in the cardiac specialized hospitals （147 minutes vs. 120 minutes, P〈0.001; 55 minutes vs. 45 minutes, P=0.035）. After controlling the confounding factors, the non-specialized hospitals were independently associated with an increased risk of being in the upper median of in-hospital delays.Conclusions There were substantial in-hospital delays between arrival at the hospital and the administration of PPCI for patients with STEMI in Beijing. Patients admitted to the cardiac specialized hospitals had a shorter in-hospital delay than those to the non-specialized hospitals because of a shorter time of ECG-to-treatment decision-making.展开更多
BACKGROUND Myocardial infarction is one of the most common types of coronary heart disease.It is mainly caused by the rupture of coronary atherosclerotic plaque,which leads to platelet agglutination and thrombosis.The...BACKGROUND Myocardial infarction is one of the most common types of coronary heart disease.It is mainly caused by the rupture of coronary atherosclerotic plaque,which leads to platelet agglutination and thrombosis.The occlusion of coronary arteries and vessels leads to insufficient myocardial blood supply,subsequently causing cardiac interstitial fibrosis,gradual enlargement of ventricles,and heart failure,which affects the quality of life and safety of patients.AIM To investigate the effects of emergency percutaneous interventional therapy(PCI)and delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction with high thrombotic load and identify factors related to major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE).METHODS A total of 164 patients with acute myocardial infarction and high thrombotic load who received PCI were included.Of them,92 patients were treated with delayed stent implantation(delayed group)and 72 patients received emergency PCI(immediate group).Myocardial perfusion after stent implantation was compared between the two groups.Patients were followed up for 12 mo,and the occurrence of MACE was used as the endpoint.Univariate and multivariate models were used to analyze the factors affecting MACE occurrence.RESULTS After stent implantation,66(71.74%)patients in the delayed group and 40(55.56%)patients in the immediate group had thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)flow grade 3(P<0.05),while 61(66.30%)patients in the delayed group and 39(54.17%)patients in the immediate group reached TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3(P>0.05).MACE occurred in 29 patients.There were statistically significant differences between the MACE and non-MACE groups in diabetes rate,TIMI grading,stent implantation timing,intraoperative use of tirofiban,and the levels of white blood cells(WBC),neutrophils,red blood cell distribution width(RDW),and uric acid,and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP)at admission(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that TIMI grade 3 and intraoperative use of tirofiban effectively reduced the risk 展开更多
文摘Background Evidence indicates that early reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） reduces complications. This study was undertaken to compare the in-hospital delay to primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PPCI） for patients with STEMI between specialized hospitals and non-specialized hospitals in Beijing, China. Methods Two specialized hospitals and fifteen non-specialized hospitals capable of performing PPCI were selected to participate in this study. A total of 308 patients, within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms and undergoing PPCI between November 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006 were enrolled. Data were collected by structured interview and review of medical records.Results The median in-hospital delay was 98 （interquartile range 105 to 180） minutes, and 16.9% of the patients were treated within 90 minutes. Total in-hospital delay and ECG-to-treatment decision-making time were longer in the non-specialized hospitals than in the cardiac specialized hospitals （147 minutes vs. 120 minutes, P〈0.001; 55 minutes vs. 45 minutes, P=0.035）. After controlling the confounding factors, the non-specialized hospitals were independently associated with an increased risk of being in the upper median of in-hospital delays.Conclusions There were substantial in-hospital delays between arrival at the hospital and the administration of PPCI for patients with STEMI in Beijing. Patients admitted to the cardiac specialized hospitals had a shorter in-hospital delay than those to the non-specialized hospitals because of a shorter time of ECG-to-treatment decision-making.
基金Supported by Quanzhou Science and Technology Bureau Approved the Project,Quanzhou Science and Technology Plan Project,No.2019N008S
文摘BACKGROUND Myocardial infarction is one of the most common types of coronary heart disease.It is mainly caused by the rupture of coronary atherosclerotic plaque,which leads to platelet agglutination and thrombosis.The occlusion of coronary arteries and vessels leads to insufficient myocardial blood supply,subsequently causing cardiac interstitial fibrosis,gradual enlargement of ventricles,and heart failure,which affects the quality of life and safety of patients.AIM To investigate the effects of emergency percutaneous interventional therapy(PCI)and delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction with high thrombotic load and identify factors related to major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE).METHODS A total of 164 patients with acute myocardial infarction and high thrombotic load who received PCI were included.Of them,92 patients were treated with delayed stent implantation(delayed group)and 72 patients received emergency PCI(immediate group).Myocardial perfusion after stent implantation was compared between the two groups.Patients were followed up for 12 mo,and the occurrence of MACE was used as the endpoint.Univariate and multivariate models were used to analyze the factors affecting MACE occurrence.RESULTS After stent implantation,66(71.74%)patients in the delayed group and 40(55.56%)patients in the immediate group had thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)flow grade 3(P<0.05),while 61(66.30%)patients in the delayed group and 39(54.17%)patients in the immediate group reached TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3(P>0.05).MACE occurred in 29 patients.There were statistically significant differences between the MACE and non-MACE groups in diabetes rate,TIMI grading,stent implantation timing,intraoperative use of tirofiban,and the levels of white blood cells(WBC),neutrophils,red blood cell distribution width(RDW),and uric acid,and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP)at admission(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that TIMI grade 3 and intraoperative use of tirofiban effectively reduced the risk
