[目的]对我国护理期刊2018年发表的Meta分析与系统评价文献进行规范性报告分析。[方法]依据Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials(CONSORT)声明、A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews(AMSTAR)和Preferred Reporting...[目的]对我国护理期刊2018年发表的Meta分析与系统评价文献进行规范性报告分析。[方法]依据Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials(CONSORT)声明、A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews(AMSTAR)和Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA)声明的相关内容和条目制定评价标准,对2018年我国护理期刊刊载Meta分析与系统评价文献的方法和结果部分的报告质量进行评价,方法部分包括方案与注册、检索策略、信息来源、检索词、检索时间、纳入标准、排除标准、文献筛选方法、数据提取方法、质量评价方法、统计学方法、概括效应指标、异质性检验方法、研究偏倚、其他分析,结果部分包括检索流程、文献选择、文献基本特征、文献质量评价结果、结果分析(单个研究的结果与结果的综合)、偏倚分析(研究内部偏倚与研究间偏倚)、其他分析。[结果]初步检索出相关文献910篇,导入NoteExpress进行查重后余325篇,阅读题目和摘要后进行初筛,仔细阅读每篇文献后,最终获取259篇文献。其中Meta分析238篇,质性研究的系统评价9篇,系统评价再评价4篇,其他8篇。238篇Meta分析中方法部分大多数文献均报告了数据库来源、纳入标准、排除标准、纳入文献的质量评价方法、统计学方法,但是没有发现文献报告方案注册情况,仅130篇文献报告了具体检索策略,181篇随机对照实验采用了Cochrane协作网制定的风险偏倚评估工具,18篇非随机对照试验采用了纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS);结果部分大部分文献均报告了纳入文献的基本特征、质量评价结果与Meta分析结果,138篇文献报告了筛选流程图,质量评价结果中仅140篇文献对纳入文献进行定级,82篇文献报告了偏倚情况。[结论]国内护理领域系统评价的文献报告较规范,方法和结果部分的关键项目均有报告,但在文献检索策略、纳入研究的质展开更多
Objective: To try to give an objective evaluation on the clinical research situation about acupuncture treatment of facial paralysis in the past 50 years and try to provide a possible evidence for clinical practice. M...Objective: To try to give an objective evaluation on the clinical research situation about acupuncture treatment of facial paralysis in the past 50 years and try to provide a possible evidence for clinical practice. Methods: All papers are searched and assessed according to the international standards and clinical epidemiology. Results: There is no systematic review (SR) on acupuncture treatment of facial palsy in a total of 1021 articles enlisted in the present paper. Comparing with the quantity of the descriptive studies and expert opinions (constituting 84.84%), that of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) is smaller (constituting 15.16%), besides, the quality of RCTs and CCTs is unsatisfactory. Conclusion: At present, the quantity and quality of studies with RCTs about acupuncture treatment of facial paralysis can’t meet the need of clinical practice, and in order to improve the therapeutic effect, a higher quality of RCTs and SR is required.展开更多
文摘[目的]对我国护理期刊2018年发表的Meta分析与系统评价文献进行规范性报告分析。[方法]依据Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials(CONSORT)声明、A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews(AMSTAR)和Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA)声明的相关内容和条目制定评价标准,对2018年我国护理期刊刊载Meta分析与系统评价文献的方法和结果部分的报告质量进行评价,方法部分包括方案与注册、检索策略、信息来源、检索词、检索时间、纳入标准、排除标准、文献筛选方法、数据提取方法、质量评价方法、统计学方法、概括效应指标、异质性检验方法、研究偏倚、其他分析,结果部分包括检索流程、文献选择、文献基本特征、文献质量评价结果、结果分析(单个研究的结果与结果的综合)、偏倚分析(研究内部偏倚与研究间偏倚)、其他分析。[结果]初步检索出相关文献910篇,导入NoteExpress进行查重后余325篇,阅读题目和摘要后进行初筛,仔细阅读每篇文献后,最终获取259篇文献。其中Meta分析238篇,质性研究的系统评价9篇,系统评价再评价4篇,其他8篇。238篇Meta分析中方法部分大多数文献均报告了数据库来源、纳入标准、排除标准、纳入文献的质量评价方法、统计学方法,但是没有发现文献报告方案注册情况,仅130篇文献报告了具体检索策略,181篇随机对照实验采用了Cochrane协作网制定的风险偏倚评估工具,18篇非随机对照试验采用了纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS);结果部分大部分文献均报告了纳入文献的基本特征、质量评价结果与Meta分析结果,138篇文献报告了筛选流程图,质量评价结果中仅140篇文献对纳入文献进行定级,82篇文献报告了偏倚情况。[结论]国内护理领域系统评价的文献报告较规范,方法和结果部分的关键项目均有报告,但在文献检索策略、纳入研究的质
文摘Objective: To try to give an objective evaluation on the clinical research situation about acupuncture treatment of facial paralysis in the past 50 years and try to provide a possible evidence for clinical practice. Methods: All papers are searched and assessed according to the international standards and clinical epidemiology. Results: There is no systematic review (SR) on acupuncture treatment of facial palsy in a total of 1021 articles enlisted in the present paper. Comparing with the quantity of the descriptive studies and expert opinions (constituting 84.84%), that of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) is smaller (constituting 15.16%), besides, the quality of RCTs and CCTs is unsatisfactory. Conclusion: At present, the quantity and quality of studies with RCTs about acupuncture treatment of facial paralysis can’t meet the need of clinical practice, and in order to improve the therapeutic effect, a higher quality of RCTs and SR is required.
