Objective:Labor is a complex process and labor pain presents challenges for analgesia.Epidural analgesia(EA)has a well-known analgesic effect and is commonly used during labor.This review summarized frequently encount...Objective:Labor is a complex process and labor pain presents challenges for analgesia.Epidural analgesia(EA)has a well-known analgesic effect and is commonly used during labor.This review summarized frequently encountered and controversial problems surrounding EA during labor,including the labor process and maternal intrapartum fever,to build knowledge in this area.Data sources:We searched for relevant articles published up to 2019 in PubMed using a range of search terms(eg,“labor pain,”“epidural,”“analgesia,”“labor process,”“maternal pyrexia,”“intrapartum fever”).Study selection:The search returned 835 articles,including randomized control trials,retrospective cohort studies,observational studies,and reviews.The articles were screened by title,abstract,and then full-text,with a sample independently screened by two authors.Thirty-eight articles were included in our final analysis;20 articles concerned the labor process and 18 reported on maternal pyrexia during EA.Results:Four classic prospective studies including 14,326 participants compared early and delayed initiation of EA by the incidence of cesarean delivery.Early initiation following an analgesia request was preferred.However,it was controversial whether continuous use of EA in the second stage of labor induced adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes due to changes in analgesic and epidural infusion regimens.There was a high incidence of maternal pyrexia in women receiving EA and women with placental inflammation or histologic chorioamnionitis compared with those receiving systemic opioids.Conclusions:Early EA(cervical dilation≥1 cm)does not increase the risk for cesarean section.Continuous epidural application of low doses of analgesics and programmed intermittent epidural bolus do not prolong second-stage labor duration or impact maternal and neonatal outcomes.The association between EA and maternal pyrexia remains controversial,but pyrexia is more common with EA than without.A non-infectious inflammatory process is an accepted m展开更多
为了揭示多媒体健康教育对初产妇分娩方式、产程和分娩结局的影响,本研究选取石家庄市第四医院产科建卡并进行常规产前检查的300例妊娠妇女作为研究对象,收集时间为2016年3月至2017年5月,采用随机数字表法将妊娠妇女分为干预组(常规产...为了揭示多媒体健康教育对初产妇分娩方式、产程和分娩结局的影响,本研究选取石家庄市第四医院产科建卡并进行常规产前检查的300例妊娠妇女作为研究对象,收集时间为2016年3月至2017年5月,采用随机数字表法将妊娠妇女分为干预组(常规产检就医嘱+产前多媒体健康教育, n=140)、对照组(常规产检就医嘱, n=142),对比两组的分娩方式、产程和分娩结局。研究显示,干预组的分娩孕周显著大于对照组(p<0.05),干预组的顺产率78.57%高于对照组的64.79%(p<0.05);干预组的第一产程潜伏期、第一产程活跃期和第二产程均低于对照组(p<0.05),两组的第三产程差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);干预组的新生儿体质量大于对照组(p<0.05);两组新生儿的1 min Apgar评分和5 min Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);干预组的分娩相关并发症发生率6.43%显著低于对照组的14.08%(p<0.05)。本研究表明,产前多媒体健康教育可有效提高初产妇顺产率、缩短产程、减少分娩相关并发症的发生。展开更多
基金supported by the grants from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China(No.81500944)the Nanjing Municipal Health Bureau General Project(No.YKK14127).
文摘Objective:Labor is a complex process and labor pain presents challenges for analgesia.Epidural analgesia(EA)has a well-known analgesic effect and is commonly used during labor.This review summarized frequently encountered and controversial problems surrounding EA during labor,including the labor process and maternal intrapartum fever,to build knowledge in this area.Data sources:We searched for relevant articles published up to 2019 in PubMed using a range of search terms(eg,“labor pain,”“epidural,”“analgesia,”“labor process,”“maternal pyrexia,”“intrapartum fever”).Study selection:The search returned 835 articles,including randomized control trials,retrospective cohort studies,observational studies,and reviews.The articles were screened by title,abstract,and then full-text,with a sample independently screened by two authors.Thirty-eight articles were included in our final analysis;20 articles concerned the labor process and 18 reported on maternal pyrexia during EA.Results:Four classic prospective studies including 14,326 participants compared early and delayed initiation of EA by the incidence of cesarean delivery.Early initiation following an analgesia request was preferred.However,it was controversial whether continuous use of EA in the second stage of labor induced adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes due to changes in analgesic and epidural infusion regimens.There was a high incidence of maternal pyrexia in women receiving EA and women with placental inflammation or histologic chorioamnionitis compared with those receiving systemic opioids.Conclusions:Early EA(cervical dilation≥1 cm)does not increase the risk for cesarean section.Continuous epidural application of low doses of analgesics and programmed intermittent epidural bolus do not prolong second-stage labor duration or impact maternal and neonatal outcomes.The association between EA and maternal pyrexia remains controversial,but pyrexia is more common with EA than without.A non-infectious inflammatory process is an accepted m
文摘为了揭示多媒体健康教育对初产妇分娩方式、产程和分娩结局的影响,本研究选取石家庄市第四医院产科建卡并进行常规产前检查的300例妊娠妇女作为研究对象,收集时间为2016年3月至2017年5月,采用随机数字表法将妊娠妇女分为干预组(常规产检就医嘱+产前多媒体健康教育, n=140)、对照组(常规产检就医嘱, n=142),对比两组的分娩方式、产程和分娩结局。研究显示,干预组的分娩孕周显著大于对照组(p<0.05),干预组的顺产率78.57%高于对照组的64.79%(p<0.05);干预组的第一产程潜伏期、第一产程活跃期和第二产程均低于对照组(p<0.05),两组的第三产程差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);干预组的新生儿体质量大于对照组(p<0.05);两组新生儿的1 min Apgar评分和5 min Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);干预组的分娩相关并发症发生率6.43%显著低于对照组的14.08%(p<0.05)。本研究表明,产前多媒体健康教育可有效提高初产妇顺产率、缩短产程、减少分娩相关并发症的发生。
