目的探讨儿科护士压力负荷对其职业生活质量的影响,以及大五人格的调节作用。方法2020年8—9月,选取湖北省9家医院工作的456名儿科护士参与本次研究。使用压力负荷量表(Stress Overload Scale,SOS)、职业生活质量量表第5版(Professional...目的探讨儿科护士压力负荷对其职业生活质量的影响,以及大五人格的调节作用。方法2020年8—9月,选取湖北省9家医院工作的456名儿科护士参与本次研究。使用压力负荷量表(Stress Overload Scale,SOS)、职业生活质量量表第5版(Professional Quality of Life Scale-5,ProQOL-5)、中国大五人格问卷简版(Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version,CBF-PI-B)进行调查。结果压力负荷(β=0.481,t=8.133,P=0.007)、神经质(β=0.163,t=2.522,P=0.015)和宜人性(β=-0.313,t=-3.860,P=0.008)对职业倦怠的差异有独特的贡献。压力负荷(β=0.452,t=5.621,P=0.002)和神经质(β=0.322,t=3.552,P=0.003)对继发性创伤应激的差异有独特的贡献。外向性(β=0.313,t=2.743,P=0.005)对同情满意度的差异有独特的贡献。神经质对压力负荷与继发性创伤应激之间有显著的调节作用(R2=0.041,F=6.552,P=0.007);宜人性对压力负荷与同情满意度之间有显著的调节作用(R2=0.021,F=4.262,P=0.018);开放性对压力负荷与同情满意度之间有显著的调节作用(R2=0.031,F=4.551,P=0.022)。结论压力负荷对儿科护士的职业生活质量有较大影响,其中主要表现在职业倦怠和继发性创伤应激,神经质、宜人性和开放性在其中起调节作用。展开更多
Investigating the role of Big Five personality traits in relation to various health outcomes has been extensively studied. The impact of “Big Five” on physical health is here explored for older Europeans with a focu...Investigating the role of Big Five personality traits in relation to various health outcomes has been extensively studied. The impact of “Big Five” on physical health is here explored for older Europeans with a focus on examining age groups differences. The study sample included 378,500 respondents derived from the seventh data wave of Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The physical health status of older Europeans was estimated by constructing an index considering the combined effect of well-established health indicators such as the number of chronic diseases, mobility limitations, limitations with basic and instrumental activities of daily living, and self-perceived health. This index was used for an overall physical health assessment, for which the higher the score for an individual, the worst health level. Then, through a dichotomization process applied to the retrieved Principal Component Analysis scores, a two-group discrimination (good or bad health status) of SHARE participants was obtained as regards their physical health condition, allowing for further con-structing logistic regression models to assess the predictive significance of “Big Five” and their protective role for physical health. Results showed that neuroti-cism was the most significant predictor of physical health for all age groups un-der consideration, while extraversion, agreeableness and openness were not found to significantly affect the self-reported physical health levels of midlife adults aged 50 up to 64. Older adults aged 65 up to 79 were more prone to open-ness, whereas the oldest old individuals aged 80 up to 105 were mainly affected by openness and conscientiousness. .展开更多
文摘目的探讨儿科护士压力负荷对其职业生活质量的影响,以及大五人格的调节作用。方法2020年8—9月,选取湖北省9家医院工作的456名儿科护士参与本次研究。使用压力负荷量表(Stress Overload Scale,SOS)、职业生活质量量表第5版(Professional Quality of Life Scale-5,ProQOL-5)、中国大五人格问卷简版(Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version,CBF-PI-B)进行调查。结果压力负荷(β=0.481,t=8.133,P=0.007)、神经质(β=0.163,t=2.522,P=0.015)和宜人性(β=-0.313,t=-3.860,P=0.008)对职业倦怠的差异有独特的贡献。压力负荷(β=0.452,t=5.621,P=0.002)和神经质(β=0.322,t=3.552,P=0.003)对继发性创伤应激的差异有独特的贡献。外向性(β=0.313,t=2.743,P=0.005)对同情满意度的差异有独特的贡献。神经质对压力负荷与继发性创伤应激之间有显著的调节作用(R2=0.041,F=6.552,P=0.007);宜人性对压力负荷与同情满意度之间有显著的调节作用(R2=0.021,F=4.262,P=0.018);开放性对压力负荷与同情满意度之间有显著的调节作用(R2=0.031,F=4.551,P=0.022)。结论压力负荷对儿科护士的职业生活质量有较大影响,其中主要表现在职业倦怠和继发性创伤应激,神经质、宜人性和开放性在其中起调节作用。
文摘Investigating the role of Big Five personality traits in relation to various health outcomes has been extensively studied. The impact of “Big Five” on physical health is here explored for older Europeans with a focus on examining age groups differences. The study sample included 378,500 respondents derived from the seventh data wave of Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The physical health status of older Europeans was estimated by constructing an index considering the combined effect of well-established health indicators such as the number of chronic diseases, mobility limitations, limitations with basic and instrumental activities of daily living, and self-perceived health. This index was used for an overall physical health assessment, for which the higher the score for an individual, the worst health level. Then, through a dichotomization process applied to the retrieved Principal Component Analysis scores, a two-group discrimination (good or bad health status) of SHARE participants was obtained as regards their physical health condition, allowing for further con-structing logistic regression models to assess the predictive significance of “Big Five” and their protective role for physical health. Results showed that neuroti-cism was the most significant predictor of physical health for all age groups un-der consideration, while extraversion, agreeableness and openness were not found to significantly affect the self-reported physical health levels of midlife adults aged 50 up to 64. Older adults aged 65 up to 79 were more prone to open-ness, whereas the oldest old individuals aged 80 up to 105 were mainly affected by openness and conscientiousness. .
