目的评价情景教学法(simulation-based learning)在护理教学中的应用效果。方法计算机检索有关情景教学法和传统教学法在护理教学中应用的对照研究。通过严格质量评价,采用Rev Man 5.1进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入14篇文献,共1 684名研...目的评价情景教学法(simulation-based learning)在护理教学中的应用效果。方法计算机检索有关情景教学法和传统教学法在护理教学中应用的对照研究。通过严格质量评价,采用Rev Man 5.1进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入14篇文献,共1 684名研究对象。分析结果显示:情景教学法能提高护生的理论成绩和操作技能,各研究之间存在统计学异质性,根据研究地点的不同进行亚组分析,研究地点为学校,护生的理论成绩和操作技能的SMD(95%CI)分别为2.96(2.26,3.66),2.61(2.36,2.85),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);研究地点为医院,护生的理论成绩和操作技能的SMD(95%CI)分别为2.31(2.13 2.50),2.20(2.02,2.38),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。情景教学法在培养护生综合业务能力方面,优于传统教学法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其RR(95%CI)为1.19(1.13,1.25)。护生对情景教学法的满意度明显高于传统教学方法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其RR(95%CI)为1.18(1.13,1.24)。结论情景教学法对护生教学效果的影响优于传统教学方法。但是纳入研究文献的质量差异较大,需要更加设计严谨、样本量大的随机对照试验来证实此结论。展开更多
目的采用Meta分析评价仿真模拟教学系统对护理教学的效果。方法计算机全面检索国内主要的医学数据库中有关仿真模拟教学的干预性研究。按照纳入及排除标准筛选文献,提取资料并评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用Rev Man 5.0分析软件进行M...目的采用Meta分析评价仿真模拟教学系统对护理教学的效果。方法计算机全面检索国内主要的医学数据库中有关仿真模拟教学的干预性研究。按照纳入及排除标准筛选文献,提取资料并评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用Rev Man 5.0分析软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入12篇文献,合计2465名护理专业学生。Meta分析结果显示:仿真模拟教学系统在提高护理专业学生理论及操作技能方面优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论仿真模拟教学系统应用于护理教学中的效果优于传统护理教学法。但因纳入研究的质量不高,仍需大样本高质量的随机对照试验进一步验证。展开更多
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of adult learning and simulation-based learning (SBL) on surgical trainees’ learning experiences and Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (FRCS) Section 2 General Surgery exa...Objectives: To evaluate the impact of adult learning and simulation-based learning (SBL) on surgical trainees’ learning experiences and Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (FRCS) Section 2 General Surgery examination pass rate. Methods: This was a cross-sequential study involving 148 surgical candidates (72 UK trainees, 75 non-UK trainees) who had attended our revision course (Phoenix FRCS Course) from June 2017 until 2023. Each course comprised a two-day weekend preparation with dedicated sections for clinical, viva, and academic reading, incorporating SBL as its key learning style. We maintained a prospective database of candidate and course details, examination results, and feedback since the course inception. Results: We found that 97% of candidates passed the FRCS examination after their first attempt. The course was attended once by 89% of candidates, and only 3 of the 148 candidates exhausted all four attempts at the examination. Candidate feedback for the course and its style of learning was positive, with simulation-based table viva sessions and virtual clinical sessions proving the most popular learning sessions (95% and 80% of candidates attending courses run in December 2017, April 2018, and May 2021 rated them “Excellent” respectively). Conclusions: The course is centered around shared adult learning and mindfulness tools to encourage candidates to learn from each other and develop confidence and mastery in all domains of surgical practice. These methods have been shown to be effective in achieving high success rates in the Intercollegiate and International FRCS examinations for UK and overseas surgeons.展开更多
文摘目的采用Meta分析评价仿真模拟教学系统对护理教学的效果。方法计算机全面检索国内主要的医学数据库中有关仿真模拟教学的干预性研究。按照纳入及排除标准筛选文献,提取资料并评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用Rev Man 5.0分析软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入12篇文献,合计2465名护理专业学生。Meta分析结果显示:仿真模拟教学系统在提高护理专业学生理论及操作技能方面优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论仿真模拟教学系统应用于护理教学中的效果优于传统护理教学法。但因纳入研究的质量不高,仍需大样本高质量的随机对照试验进一步验证。
文摘Objectives: To evaluate the impact of adult learning and simulation-based learning (SBL) on surgical trainees’ learning experiences and Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (FRCS) Section 2 General Surgery examination pass rate. Methods: This was a cross-sequential study involving 148 surgical candidates (72 UK trainees, 75 non-UK trainees) who had attended our revision course (Phoenix FRCS Course) from June 2017 until 2023. Each course comprised a two-day weekend preparation with dedicated sections for clinical, viva, and academic reading, incorporating SBL as its key learning style. We maintained a prospective database of candidate and course details, examination results, and feedback since the course inception. Results: We found that 97% of candidates passed the FRCS examination after their first attempt. The course was attended once by 89% of candidates, and only 3 of the 148 candidates exhausted all four attempts at the examination. Candidate feedback for the course and its style of learning was positive, with simulation-based table viva sessions and virtual clinical sessions proving the most popular learning sessions (95% and 80% of candidates attending courses run in December 2017, April 2018, and May 2021 rated them “Excellent” respectively). Conclusions: The course is centered around shared adult learning and mindfulness tools to encourage candidates to learn from each other and develop confidence and mastery in all domains of surgical practice. These methods have been shown to be effective in achieving high success rates in the Intercollegiate and International FRCS examinations for UK and overseas surgeons.
