目的:探讨基于应激系统理论的护理干预在口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年1月-2021年10月在笔者医院口腔科收治的80例口腔颌面部损伤患者作为研究对象,采用1:1简单随机数表法将入组患者分为观察组和对照组,每组4...目的:探讨基于应激系统理论的护理干预在口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年1月-2021年10月在笔者医院口腔科收治的80例口腔颌面部损伤患者作为研究对象,采用1:1简单随机数表法将入组患者分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。两组患者均在急诊科抢救室进行口腔颌面部修复重建,并于修复完成后进急诊观察室观察病情。对照组予以急诊科常规护理,观察组行基于应激系统理论的护理干预,持续护理直至患者病情稳定后离开急诊。护理后比较两组疼痛水平、睡眠、心理状态、术后并发症、满意度评价情况。结果:术后第6 h、术后第3天疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual analog scoring,VAS)先升高后下降,且观察组均低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天,两组患者匹茨堡睡眠质量(Pittsburg sleep quality index,PSQI)评分均明显降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者心理韧性评分(Chinese version of resilience scale,CD-RISC)均明显升高,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后病房环境、技术操作、术后形态、服务态度满意度问卷评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:基于应激系统理论的护理干预可以降低口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者术后疼痛应激水平,并改善患者睡眠与心理状态。展开更多
Background: Maxillofacial injury may vary from simple soft tissue lacerations to complex fractures of the orofacial region. Soft tissue injuries, whether isolated or in combination with other injuries, form part of th...Background: Maxillofacial injury may vary from simple soft tissue lacerations to complex fractures of the orofacial region. Soft tissue injuries, whether isolated or in combination with other injuries, form part of the frequent traumatic craniofacial injuries seen at the emergency department. The force of impact and the injury type is directly related to the severity of the injury sustained. This study aimed to analyze the etiological factors, prevalence, and management of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue injuries at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. Methods: This was a prospective study that involved children presenting with oral and maxillofacial injuries at the Accident and Emergency Department and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery unit of the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi between the period of April to October 2020 (6 months). Patient selection was by convenience sampling targeting all children with injuries who met the inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were children below the age of 18 years whose parents or caregivers consent to participation. Children with maxillofacial injuries as a result of burns were excluded from the study. Results: During the study period a total of 134 children were reviewed with oral and maxillofacial injuries at KATH. Of these, 107 (78.9%) were recorded cases of orofacial soft tissue injuries. There were 63 (58.9%) males and 44 (41.1%) females and the male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. The age range of patients studied was 8 months – 17 years, with mean age ± SD being 9.5 ± 5.3 years. Road Traffic Crash (50.5%) was the most common etiology of which Motor cycle crash constituted 24.3% and Pedestrian knockdown was 19.6%. Falls (42.1%) were the next most common etiology. The lips (19.8%) and the forehead (18.5%) were the most frequently injured sites on the face whiles the tongue (3.3%) had the most injuries intraorally. Laceration (45.7%) was the most frequent injury reviewed, followed by abrasions (35.8%). Most of the soft tissue injuries underwent primary clo展开更多
目的 探讨以问题为基础教学法(problem based learning,PBL)结合思维导图在“口腔颌面部损伤”章节教学中的应用效果。方法 2020年8月-2021年1月,选择滨州医学院2017级口腔医学本科学生为研究对象,共24名,随机分为试验组、对照组,各12...目的 探讨以问题为基础教学法(problem based learning,PBL)结合思维导图在“口腔颌面部损伤”章节教学中的应用效果。方法 2020年8月-2021年1月,选择滨州医学院2017级口腔医学本科学生为研究对象,共24名,随机分为试验组、对照组,各12名。在《口腔颌面外科学》的“口腔颌面部损伤”章节教学中,试验组采用PBL教学法结合思维导图教学,对照组采用传统以授课为基础(lecture based learning,LBL)的教学。通过问卷调查和理论测试的方法对2种教学方法的效果进行评价。结果 试验组学生自身理论知识的理解、临床诊断和治疗水平、自主学习能力、相互协作能力、自身沟通能力以及课堂活跃程度方面均有所提高。两组理论基础知识成绩比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05);试验组病例分析成绩优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 学生对于PBL教学法结合思维导图的认可度较高,提高了学生病例分析成绩,增强了教学效果。展开更多
文摘目的:探讨基于应激系统理论的护理干预在口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年1月-2021年10月在笔者医院口腔科收治的80例口腔颌面部损伤患者作为研究对象,采用1:1简单随机数表法将入组患者分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。两组患者均在急诊科抢救室进行口腔颌面部修复重建,并于修复完成后进急诊观察室观察病情。对照组予以急诊科常规护理,观察组行基于应激系统理论的护理干预,持续护理直至患者病情稳定后离开急诊。护理后比较两组疼痛水平、睡眠、心理状态、术后并发症、满意度评价情况。结果:术后第6 h、术后第3天疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual analog scoring,VAS)先升高后下降,且观察组均低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天,两组患者匹茨堡睡眠质量(Pittsburg sleep quality index,PSQI)评分均明显降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者心理韧性评分(Chinese version of resilience scale,CD-RISC)均明显升高,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后病房环境、技术操作、术后形态、服务态度满意度问卷评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:基于应激系统理论的护理干预可以降低口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者术后疼痛应激水平,并改善患者睡眠与心理状态。
文摘Background: Maxillofacial injury may vary from simple soft tissue lacerations to complex fractures of the orofacial region. Soft tissue injuries, whether isolated or in combination with other injuries, form part of the frequent traumatic craniofacial injuries seen at the emergency department. The force of impact and the injury type is directly related to the severity of the injury sustained. This study aimed to analyze the etiological factors, prevalence, and management of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue injuries at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. Methods: This was a prospective study that involved children presenting with oral and maxillofacial injuries at the Accident and Emergency Department and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery unit of the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi between the period of April to October 2020 (6 months). Patient selection was by convenience sampling targeting all children with injuries who met the inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were children below the age of 18 years whose parents or caregivers consent to participation. Children with maxillofacial injuries as a result of burns were excluded from the study. Results: During the study period a total of 134 children were reviewed with oral and maxillofacial injuries at KATH. Of these, 107 (78.9%) were recorded cases of orofacial soft tissue injuries. There were 63 (58.9%) males and 44 (41.1%) females and the male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. The age range of patients studied was 8 months – 17 years, with mean age ± SD being 9.5 ± 5.3 years. Road Traffic Crash (50.5%) was the most common etiology of which Motor cycle crash constituted 24.3% and Pedestrian knockdown was 19.6%. Falls (42.1%) were the next most common etiology. The lips (19.8%) and the forehead (18.5%) were the most frequently injured sites on the face whiles the tongue (3.3%) had the most injuries intraorally. Laceration (45.7%) was the most frequent injury reviewed, followed by abrasions (35.8%). Most of the soft tissue injuries underwent primary clo
文摘目的 探讨以问题为基础教学法(problem based learning,PBL)结合思维导图在“口腔颌面部损伤”章节教学中的应用效果。方法 2020年8月-2021年1月,选择滨州医学院2017级口腔医学本科学生为研究对象,共24名,随机分为试验组、对照组,各12名。在《口腔颌面外科学》的“口腔颌面部损伤”章节教学中,试验组采用PBL教学法结合思维导图教学,对照组采用传统以授课为基础(lecture based learning,LBL)的教学。通过问卷调查和理论测试的方法对2种教学方法的效果进行评价。结果 试验组学生自身理论知识的理解、临床诊断和治疗水平、自主学习能力、相互协作能力、自身沟通能力以及课堂活跃程度方面均有所提高。两组理论基础知识成绩比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05);试验组病例分析成绩优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 学生对于PBL教学法结合思维导图的认可度较高,提高了学生病例分析成绩,增强了教学效果。
