目的评价关节腔内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)相对于透明质酸(HA)钠治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法选择2013年2月至2014年5月山东大学附属省立医院和威海市立医院门诊收治的126例Keligren Lawrence分级(K-L分级)Ⅱ、Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎...目的评价关节腔内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)相对于透明质酸(HA)钠治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法选择2013年2月至2014年5月山东大学附属省立医院和威海市立医院门诊收治的126例Keligren Lawrence分级(K-L分级)Ⅱ、Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分为HA组63例63膝,男性18例,女性45例,平均年龄(61±10)岁;PRP组63例63膝,男性12例,女性51例,年龄(61±10)岁。分别采用2 ml HA(施沛特,共5次,分别在第0、1、2、3、4周注射)和3.5 ml PRP(威高富血小板血浆制备套装,共3次,分别在第0、2、4周注射)关节腔内注射进行治疗。患者在治疗前和完成全部注射后的1、3、6、12个月进行复诊并记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)值、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、美国西部Ontario与Mc Master大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分等。采用单因素方差分析对两组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、K-L分级、VAS评分、IKDC评分、WOMAC评分进行分析,采用重复测量的方差分析比较治疗后的疗效以及PRP及HA治疗的效果。结果 PRP组58例、HA组55例患者获得随访12个月,平均随访(14±2)个月和(16±3)个月。通过分析,两组在性别、年龄、体重指数、K-L分级、VAS、IKDC评分、WOMAC评分的比较中,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。PRP组患者16例40次出现不良反应,HA组14例37次出现不良反应;两组不良反应起始时间、终止时间及持续时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后VAS评分、IKDC评分及WOMAC评分与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);HA组治疗后6、12个月各评价指标治疗后较1、3个月差,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后1、3个月后,VAS评分、IKDC评分及WOMAC评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但是治疗后6、12个月时,PRP组各指标均优于HA组(P<0.05)。结论关节内注射PRP治疗膝关节软骨退行性变安全有效,可缓解展开更多
Background With the increasing popularity of cosmetic facial filler injections in recent years, more and more associated complications have been reported. However, the causative surgical procedures and preventative me...Background With the increasing popularity of cosmetic facial filler injections in recent years, more and more associated complications have been reported. However, the causative surgical procedures and preventative measures have not been studied well up to now. The aim of this stady was to investigate the clinical characteristics and visual prognosis of fundus artery occlusion resulting from cosmetic facial filler injections. Methods Thirteen consecutive patients with fundus artery occlusion caused by facial filler injections were included. Main outcome measures were filler materials, injection sites, best-corrected visual acuity （BCVA）, fundus fluorescein angiography, and associated ocular and systemic manifestations. Results Eleven patients had ophthalmic artery occlusion （OAO） and one patient each had central retinal artery occlusion （CRAO） and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy （AION）. Injected materials included autologous fat （seven cases）, hyaluronic acid （five cases）, and bone collagen （one case）. Injection sites were the frontal area （five cases）, periocular area （two cases）, temple area （two cases）, and nose area and nasal area （4 cases）. Injected autologous fat was associated with worse final BCVA than hyaluronic acid. The BCVA of seven patients with autologous fat injection in frontal area and temple area was no light perception. Most of the patients with OAO had ocular pain, headache, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and no improvement in final BCVA. Conclusions Cosmetic facial injections can cause fundus artery occlusion. Autologous fat injection tends to be associated with painful blindness, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and poor visual outcomes. The prognosis is much worse with autologous fat injection than hyaluronic acid iniection.展开更多
文摘目的评价关节腔内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)相对于透明质酸(HA)钠治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法选择2013年2月至2014年5月山东大学附属省立医院和威海市立医院门诊收治的126例Keligren Lawrence分级(K-L分级)Ⅱ、Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分为HA组63例63膝,男性18例,女性45例,平均年龄(61±10)岁;PRP组63例63膝,男性12例,女性51例,年龄(61±10)岁。分别采用2 ml HA(施沛特,共5次,分别在第0、1、2、3、4周注射)和3.5 ml PRP(威高富血小板血浆制备套装,共3次,分别在第0、2、4周注射)关节腔内注射进行治疗。患者在治疗前和完成全部注射后的1、3、6、12个月进行复诊并记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)值、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、美国西部Ontario与Mc Master大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分等。采用单因素方差分析对两组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、K-L分级、VAS评分、IKDC评分、WOMAC评分进行分析,采用重复测量的方差分析比较治疗后的疗效以及PRP及HA治疗的效果。结果 PRP组58例、HA组55例患者获得随访12个月,平均随访(14±2)个月和(16±3)个月。通过分析,两组在性别、年龄、体重指数、K-L分级、VAS、IKDC评分、WOMAC评分的比较中,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。PRP组患者16例40次出现不良反应,HA组14例37次出现不良反应;两组不良反应起始时间、终止时间及持续时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后VAS评分、IKDC评分及WOMAC评分与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);HA组治疗后6、12个月各评价指标治疗后较1、3个月差,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后1、3个月后,VAS评分、IKDC评分及WOMAC评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但是治疗后6、12个月时,PRP组各指标均优于HA组(P<0.05)。结论关节内注射PRP治疗膝关节软骨退行性变安全有效,可缓解
文摘Background With the increasing popularity of cosmetic facial filler injections in recent years, more and more associated complications have been reported. However, the causative surgical procedures and preventative measures have not been studied well up to now. The aim of this stady was to investigate the clinical characteristics and visual prognosis of fundus artery occlusion resulting from cosmetic facial filler injections. Methods Thirteen consecutive patients with fundus artery occlusion caused by facial filler injections were included. Main outcome measures were filler materials, injection sites, best-corrected visual acuity （BCVA）, fundus fluorescein angiography, and associated ocular and systemic manifestations. Results Eleven patients had ophthalmic artery occlusion （OAO） and one patient each had central retinal artery occlusion （CRAO） and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy （AION）. Injected materials included autologous fat （seven cases）, hyaluronic acid （five cases）, and bone collagen （one case）. Injection sites were the frontal area （five cases）, periocular area （two cases）, temple area （two cases）, and nose area and nasal area （4 cases）. Injected autologous fat was associated with worse final BCVA than hyaluronic acid. The BCVA of seven patients with autologous fat injection in frontal area and temple area was no light perception. Most of the patients with OAO had ocular pain, headache, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and no improvement in final BCVA. Conclusions Cosmetic facial injections can cause fundus artery occlusion. Autologous fat injection tends to be associated with painful blindness, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and poor visual outcomes. The prognosis is much worse with autologous fat injection than hyaluronic acid iniection.
