抗阻训练是五人制足球中常用的体能训练方法,但近年有研究提出传统力量训练存在局限性。本文主要讨论基于速度的力量训练(Velocity Based Training,VBT)的技术优势,以及如何使用它来提高五人制足球运动的运动表现。研究发现,VBT的优势...抗阻训练是五人制足球中常用的体能训练方法,但近年有研究提出传统力量训练存在局限性。本文主要讨论基于速度的力量训练(Velocity Based Training,VBT)的技术优势,以及如何使用它来提高五人制足球运动的运动表现。研究发现,VBT的优势在于它作为非侵入式的力量训练,可以用量化指标客观监控肌肉力量表现,实时反馈训练状态,确定个性化精确负荷,保证训练的针对性,协助打破力量水平瓶颈,达到提高足球运动员运动能力和运动表现的效果。展开更多
Background:The side effects of the FIFA 11+program on performance have not been generally reviewed.The objective of this study was to synthesize the literature on the effects of the 11+on players’performance.Methods:...Background:The side effects of the FIFA 11+program on performance have not been generally reviewed.The objective of this study was to synthesize the literature on the effects of the 11+on players’performance.Methods:Five online databases(PubMed,Scopus,ScienceDirect,Springer,and Google Scholar)were searched(from April 2006 to March 2022)using predefined keywords and sub-keywords.The potential references were primarily recorded through Endnote and imported to Covidence.Out of the 123 references screened by 2 blinded researchers through the software,59 full texts were assessed for eligibility,33 of which were ultimately included.The quality of the studies and the risk of bias were then assessed.Study ID,title,place,aim,design,start/end dates,population description,study criteria,statistical analysis,and outcomes were extracted.Results:Studies were conducted on male and female players aged 10-32 years old.The quality of the studies was moderate to high,and except for unclear bias for blinding outcome assessment,the risk of bias for all domains was low.Long-term application of the 11+improved most biomechanical measures and physiological responses except for lower extremity stability,ankle evertors time latency,ankle dorsiflexion,and proprioception.Conversely,the 11+showed acute negative effects on physical performance compared to dynamic warm-ups and non-significant effects on technical abilities.Conclusion:Mid-to-long-term implementation of the 11+improved the maj ority of biomechanical and a couple of physical measure s but showed no effects on technical skills.Precaution must be observed for using the 11+before competitions,as it could acutely decrease physical/technical performance.Given the contradictory nature of the literature,further studies should evaluate the short-to-mid-term effects of the 11+.Further studies are required to address ankle responses to the 11+intervention.展开更多
文摘抗阻训练是五人制足球中常用的体能训练方法,但近年有研究提出传统力量训练存在局限性。本文主要讨论基于速度的力量训练(Velocity Based Training,VBT)的技术优势,以及如何使用它来提高五人制足球运动的运动表现。研究发现,VBT的优势在于它作为非侵入式的力量训练,可以用量化指标客观监控肌肉力量表现,实时反馈训练状态,确定个性化精确负荷,保证训练的针对性,协助打破力量水平瓶颈,达到提高足球运动员运动能力和运动表现的效果。
文摘Background:The side effects of the FIFA 11+program on performance have not been generally reviewed.The objective of this study was to synthesize the literature on the effects of the 11+on players’performance.Methods:Five online databases(PubMed,Scopus,ScienceDirect,Springer,and Google Scholar)were searched(from April 2006 to March 2022)using predefined keywords and sub-keywords.The potential references were primarily recorded through Endnote and imported to Covidence.Out of the 123 references screened by 2 blinded researchers through the software,59 full texts were assessed for eligibility,33 of which were ultimately included.The quality of the studies and the risk of bias were then assessed.Study ID,title,place,aim,design,start/end dates,population description,study criteria,statistical analysis,and outcomes were extracted.Results:Studies were conducted on male and female players aged 10-32 years old.The quality of the studies was moderate to high,and except for unclear bias for blinding outcome assessment,the risk of bias for all domains was low.Long-term application of the 11+improved most biomechanical measures and physiological responses except for lower extremity stability,ankle evertors time latency,ankle dorsiflexion,and proprioception.Conversely,the 11+showed acute negative effects on physical performance compared to dynamic warm-ups and non-significant effects on technical abilities.Conclusion:Mid-to-long-term implementation of the 11+improved the maj ority of biomechanical and a couple of physical measure s but showed no effects on technical skills.Precaution must be observed for using the 11+before competitions,as it could acutely decrease physical/technical performance.Given the contradictory nature of the literature,further studies should evaluate the short-to-mid-term effects of the 11+.Further studies are required to address ankle responses to the 11+intervention.
