It was introduced that the Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABC), proposed by neurology department of Beijing Medical University. According to the experience of aphasia research for 1O years, we summarized the main types o...It was introduced that the Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABC), proposed by neurology department of Beijing Medical University. According to the experience of aphasia research for 1O years, we summarized the main types of Chinese aphasia and the differential diagnostic principles for them,and the differential diagnosis flow diagram of all major Chinese aphasia types was advanced according to the four principles-Ai repetition, fluency, auditory comprehension and oral or written language disorders. It was pointed out the classification of aphasia will provide the reliable basis for language rehabilitation and the four principles offer the information for localized lesions of brain.展开更多
目的探究听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)患儿在背景噪音下接受听觉康复的可行性。方法选择2017年1月~2020年1月于我院接受治疗的80例听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿,按治疗方式...目的探究听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)患儿在背景噪音下接受听觉康复的可行性。方法选择2017年1月~2020年1月于我院接受治疗的80例听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿,按治疗方式分为实验组与对照组各40例,两组患儿均接受听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍干预,实验组在有背景噪音下,对照组在无背景噪音下分别进行听觉康复干预,干预6个月后对比两组患儿注意缺陷多动障碍评定量表(version IV of swanson nolan and pelham,SNAP-IV)、视听整合持续测试(integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test,IVA-CPT)、听觉行为分级(CAP)及言语可懂度分级(SIR)量表评分。结果干预前两组患儿的SNAP-IV、IVA-CPT、CAP、SIR量表得分无显著性差异(P>0.05),干预后实验组患儿的SNAP-IV、IVA-CPT量表得分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),CAP及SIR分级显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿在背景噪音下听觉言语理解能力得到较大改善。展开更多
文摘It was introduced that the Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABC), proposed by neurology department of Beijing Medical University. According to the experience of aphasia research for 1O years, we summarized the main types of Chinese aphasia and the differential diagnostic principles for them,and the differential diagnosis flow diagram of all major Chinese aphasia types was advanced according to the four principles-Ai repetition, fluency, auditory comprehension and oral or written language disorders. It was pointed out the classification of aphasia will provide the reliable basis for language rehabilitation and the four principles offer the information for localized lesions of brain.
文摘目的探究听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)患儿在背景噪音下接受听觉康复的可行性。方法选择2017年1月~2020年1月于我院接受治疗的80例听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿,按治疗方式分为实验组与对照组各40例,两组患儿均接受听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍干预,实验组在有背景噪音下,对照组在无背景噪音下分别进行听觉康复干预,干预6个月后对比两组患儿注意缺陷多动障碍评定量表(version IV of swanson nolan and pelham,SNAP-IV)、视听整合持续测试(integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test,IVA-CPT)、听觉行为分级(CAP)及言语可懂度分级(SIR)量表评分。结果干预前两组患儿的SNAP-IV、IVA-CPT、CAP、SIR量表得分无显著性差异(P>0.05),干预后实验组患儿的SNAP-IV、IVA-CPT量表得分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),CAP及SIR分级显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论听力障碍合并注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿在背景噪音下听觉言语理解能力得到较大改善。
