Recently, plant construction throughout the world, including nuclear power plant construction, has grown significantly. The scale of Korea’s nuclear power plant construction in particular, has increased gradually sin...Recently, plant construction throughout the world, including nuclear power plant construction, has grown significantly. The scale of Korea’s nuclear power plant construction in particular, has increased gradually since it won a contract for a nuclear power plant construction project in the United Arab Emirates in 2009. However, time and monetary resources have been lost in some nuclear power plant construction sites due to lack of risk management ability. The need to prevent losses at nuclear power plant construction sites has become more urgent because it demands professional skills and large-scale resources. Therefore, in this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) were applied in order to make comparisons between decision-making methods, to assess the potential risks at nuclear power plant construction sites. To suggest the appropriate choice between two decision-making methods, a survey was carried out. From the results, the importance and the priority of 24 risk factors, classified by process, cost, safety, and quality, were analyzed. The FAHP was identified as a suitable method for risk assessment of nuclear power plant construction, compared with risk assessment using the AHP. These risk factors will be able to serve as baseline data for risk management in nuclear power plant construction projects.展开更多
[Objective] The aim was to evaluate the vulnerability to pollution of shallow groundwater in Or（los Cretaceous Basin system. [Method] Mathematical modeling, GIS spatial analysis and multivariate statistical analysis ...[Objective] The aim was to evaluate the vulnerability to pollution of shallow groundwater in Or（los Cretaceous Basin system. [Method] Mathematical modeling, GIS spatial analysis and multivariate statistical analysis technologies were introduced to improve the traditional groundwater vulnerability assessment model of DRASTIC in view of its strong subjective for expert estimation and weight assigning. In the meantime, the intensi- ty and reasons of vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in the area were studied, and measures to protect local groundwater were proposed. [Resultl Using improved DRASTIC method to assess the vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in Ordos Cretaceous Basin system was objective and reliable. The application of fertilizer was the main influential factors to the vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in Ordos Cretaceous Basin sys- tem. It was advised to lessen the usage of fertilizer and not to drink water from lake or deep ground water. Density, rock, and evaporation were fac- tors that led to intensive vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in shallow areas. [ Conclusion] The study provided a new method for the evaluation of vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in Ordos Basin.展开更多
文摘Recently, plant construction throughout the world, including nuclear power plant construction, has grown significantly. The scale of Korea’s nuclear power plant construction in particular, has increased gradually since it won a contract for a nuclear power plant construction project in the United Arab Emirates in 2009. However, time and monetary resources have been lost in some nuclear power plant construction sites due to lack of risk management ability. The need to prevent losses at nuclear power plant construction sites has become more urgent because it demands professional skills and large-scale resources. Therefore, in this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) were applied in order to make comparisons between decision-making methods, to assess the potential risks at nuclear power plant construction sites. To suggest the appropriate choice between two decision-making methods, a survey was carried out. From the results, the importance and the priority of 24 risk factors, classified by process, cost, safety, and quality, were analyzed. The FAHP was identified as a suitable method for risk assessment of nuclear power plant construction, compared with risk assessment using the AHP. These risk factors will be able to serve as baseline data for risk management in nuclear power plant construction projects.
文摘[Objective] The aim was to evaluate the vulnerability to pollution of shallow groundwater in Or（los Cretaceous Basin system. [Method] Mathematical modeling, GIS spatial analysis and multivariate statistical analysis technologies were introduced to improve the traditional groundwater vulnerability assessment model of DRASTIC in view of its strong subjective for expert estimation and weight assigning. In the meantime, the intensi- ty and reasons of vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in the area were studied, and measures to protect local groundwater were proposed. [Resultl Using improved DRASTIC method to assess the vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in Ordos Cretaceous Basin system was objective and reliable. The application of fertilizer was the main influential factors to the vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in Ordos Cretaceous Basin sys- tem. It was advised to lessen the usage of fertilizer and not to drink water from lake or deep ground water. Density, rock, and evaporation were fac- tors that led to intensive vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in shallow areas. [ Conclusion] The study provided a new method for the evaluation of vulnerability to pollution of groundwater in Ordos Basin.
