目的:比较超声引导下经皮射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗原发性小肝癌(直径≤3 cm)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月—2015年6月35例行超声引导下经皮射频消融治疗的原发性小肝癌患者(消融组),以及同期30例行腹腔镜肝切除术治疗的原发...目的:比较超声引导下经皮射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗原发性小肝癌(直径≤3 cm)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月—2015年6月35例行超声引导下经皮射频消融治疗的原发性小肝癌患者(消融组),以及同期30例行腹腔镜肝切除术治疗的原发性小肝癌患者(腔镜组)临床资料,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、术后复发率及生存情况。结果:与腔镜组比较,消融组手术时间(53.89 min vs.128.57 min)、术中出血量(7.29 mL vs.115.33 mL)、术后住院时间(1.86 d vs.5.50 d)、住院费用(1.73万元vs.2.23万元)均明显减少(P<0.05);术后肝功能指标、并发症发生率组间无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。消融组与腔镜组的手术根治率(97.1%vs.100.0%)、3年复发率(51.4%vs.40.0%)以及术后1、2、3年无瘤生存率(74.3%vs.76.7%、62.9%vs.66.7%、37.1%vs.40.0%)与总生存率(85.7%vs.86.7%、82.9%vs.83.3%、77.1%vs.80.0%)差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:射频消融与腹腔镜手术切除治疗原发性小肝癌的疗效相似。射频治疗具有创伤小、手术时间短、术后恢复快等优点,在小肝癌的治疗中有重要的临床价值。展开更多
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most common neoplasms worldwide. Surgical resection and local ablative therapies represent the most frequent first lines therapies adopted when liver transplantatio...Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most common neoplasms worldwide. Surgical resection and local ablative therapies represent the most frequent first lines therapies adopted when liver transplantation can not be offered or is not immediately accessible. Hepatic resection (HR) is currently considered the most curative strategy, but in the last decade local ablative therapies have started to obtain satisfactory results in term of efficacy and, of them, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered the reference standard. An extensive literature review, from the year 2000, was performed, focusing on results coming from studies that directly compared HR and RFA. Qualities of the studies, characteristics of patients included, and patient survival and recurrence rates were analyzed. Except for three randomized controlled trials (RCT), most studies are affected by uncertain methodological approaches since surgical and ablated patients represent different populations as regards clinical and tumor features that are known to affect prognosis. Unfortunately, even the available RCTs report conflicting results. Until further evidences become available, it seems reasonable to offer RFA to very small HCC (< 2 cm) with no technical contraindications, since in this instance complete necrosis is most likely to be achieved. In larger nodules, namely > 2 cm and especially if > 3 cm, and/or in tumor locations in which ablation is not expected to be effective or safe, surgical removal is to be preferred.展开更多
文摘目的:比较超声引导下经皮射频消融与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗原发性小肝癌(直径≤3 cm)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月—2015年6月35例行超声引导下经皮射频消融治疗的原发性小肝癌患者(消融组),以及同期30例行腹腔镜肝切除术治疗的原发性小肝癌患者(腔镜组)临床资料,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、术后复发率及生存情况。结果:与腔镜组比较,消融组手术时间(53.89 min vs.128.57 min)、术中出血量(7.29 mL vs.115.33 mL)、术后住院时间(1.86 d vs.5.50 d)、住院费用(1.73万元vs.2.23万元)均明显减少(P<0.05);术后肝功能指标、并发症发生率组间无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。消融组与腔镜组的手术根治率(97.1%vs.100.0%)、3年复发率(51.4%vs.40.0%)以及术后1、2、3年无瘤生存率(74.3%vs.76.7%、62.9%vs.66.7%、37.1%vs.40.0%)与总生存率(85.7%vs.86.7%、82.9%vs.83.3%、77.1%vs.80.0%)差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:射频消融与腹腔镜手术切除治疗原发性小肝癌的疗效相似。射频治疗具有创伤小、手术时间短、术后恢复快等优点,在小肝癌的治疗中有重要的临床价值。
基金Supported by A speaker fee from Siemens, research contracts with Esaote and advisory board and speaker fee from Bayer to Fabio Piscaglia
文摘Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most common neoplasms worldwide. Surgical resection and local ablative therapies represent the most frequent first lines therapies adopted when liver transplantation can not be offered or is not immediately accessible. Hepatic resection (HR) is currently considered the most curative strategy, but in the last decade local ablative therapies have started to obtain satisfactory results in term of efficacy and, of them, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered the reference standard. An extensive literature review, from the year 2000, was performed, focusing on results coming from studies that directly compared HR and RFA. Qualities of the studies, characteristics of patients included, and patient survival and recurrence rates were analyzed. Except for three randomized controlled trials (RCT), most studies are affected by uncertain methodological approaches since surgical and ablated patients represent different populations as regards clinical and tumor features that are known to affect prognosis. Unfortunately, even the available RCTs report conflicting results. Until further evidences become available, it seems reasonable to offer RFA to very small HCC (< 2 cm) with no technical contraindications, since in this instance complete necrosis is most likely to be achieved. In larger nodules, namely > 2 cm and especially if > 3 cm, and/or in tumor locations in which ablation is not expected to be effective or safe, surgical removal is to be preferred.
